The Recent Anti-Secession Law of the PRC: A Comment

The Anti-Secession Law was adopted on 14 March 2005, the final day of the annual session of the National People's Congress of the PRC. This Taiwan-specific piece of legislation overshadowed Jiang Zemin's final exit from the political scene and can be considered as the most important busine...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:China report (New Delhi) 2005-08, Vol.41 (3), p.289-297
Main Author: Gupta, Ranjit
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
China
Communist parties
Deterrence
Law
Nationalism
Peoples Republic of China
Secession
Sovereignty
Taiwan
Territorial disputes
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 297
container_issue 3
container_start_page 289
container_title China report (New Delhi)
container_volume 41
creator Gupta, Ranjit
description The Anti-Secession Law was adopted on 14 March 2005, the final day of the annual session of the National People's Congress of the PRC. This Taiwan-specific piece of legislation overshadowed Jiang Zemin's final exit from the political scene and can be considered as the most important business transacted at this session. This Chinese move has attracted considerable international attention in the media, amongst China scholars and from foreign governments. However, there is widespread divergence of views regarding the motivations for this action, its timing, its real import and potential consequences.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/000944550504100305
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59721878</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_000944550504100305</sage_id><sourcerecordid>59721878</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-a50d8582e0660e428a86540411865f294f4076eadda93e5a971e1656286d2c6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9Lw0AUxBdRsFa_gKecxEvs2_-7xxK0CgGlVvC2LMmLpqRJzSaI394t8Sboaebwm-G9IeSSwg2lWi8AwAohJUgQFICDPCIzsJqnoPjrcfQRSA_EKTkLYQvAuNFsRq4375isscB2SJbtUKfP0YdQd22S-8-kq5IhAk_r7JycVL4JePGjc_Jyd7vJ7tP8cfWQLfO04ABD6iWURhqGoBSgYMYbJUU8ikatmBWVAK3Ql6W3HKW3miJVUjGjSlYo5HNyNfXu--5jxDC4XR0KbBrfYjcGJ61m1GjzL8i1VtpoG0E2gUXfhdBj5fZ9vfP9l6PgDuu53-vF0GIKBf-GbtuNfRu__ivxDVwRaxk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>37767879</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Recent Anti-Secession Law of the PRC: A Comment</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Gupta, Ranjit</creator><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Ranjit</creatorcontrib><description>The Anti-Secession Law was adopted on 14 March 2005, the final day of the annual session of the National People's Congress of the PRC. This Taiwan-specific piece of legislation overshadowed Jiang Zemin's final exit from the political scene and can be considered as the most important business transacted at this session. This Chinese move has attracted considerable international attention in the media, amongst China scholars and from foreign governments. However, there is widespread divergence of views regarding the motivations for this action, its timing, its real import and potential consequences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-4455</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0973-063X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/000944550504100305</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CHRPAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>B-42, Panchsheel Enclave, New Delhi: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>China ; Communist parties ; Deterrence ; Law ; Nationalism ; Peoples Republic of China ; Secession ; Sovereignty ; Taiwan ; Territorial disputes</subject><ispartof>China report (New Delhi), 2005-08, Vol.41 (3), p.289-297</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,33222,79134</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Ranjit</creatorcontrib><title>The Recent Anti-Secession Law of the PRC: A Comment</title><title>China report (New Delhi)</title><description>The Anti-Secession Law was adopted on 14 March 2005, the final day of the annual session of the National People's Congress of the PRC. This Taiwan-specific piece of legislation overshadowed Jiang Zemin's final exit from the political scene and can be considered as the most important business transacted at this session. This Chinese move has attracted considerable international attention in the media, amongst China scholars and from foreign governments. However, there is widespread divergence of views regarding the motivations for this action, its timing, its real import and potential consequences.</description><subject>China</subject><subject>Communist parties</subject><subject>Deterrence</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Nationalism</subject><subject>Peoples Republic of China</subject><subject>Secession</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>Taiwan</subject><subject>Territorial disputes</subject><issn>0009-4455</issn><issn>0973-063X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE9Lw0AUxBdRsFa_gKecxEvs2_-7xxK0CgGlVvC2LMmLpqRJzSaI394t8Sboaebwm-G9IeSSwg2lWi8AwAohJUgQFICDPCIzsJqnoPjrcfQRSA_EKTkLYQvAuNFsRq4375isscB2SJbtUKfP0YdQd22S-8-kq5IhAk_r7JycVL4JePGjc_Jyd7vJ7tP8cfWQLfO04ABD6iWURhqGoBSgYMYbJUU8ikatmBWVAK3Ql6W3HKW3miJVUjGjSlYo5HNyNfXu--5jxDC4XR0KbBrfYjcGJ61m1GjzL8i1VtpoG0E2gUXfhdBj5fZ9vfP9l6PgDuu53-vF0GIKBf-GbtuNfRu__ivxDVwRaxk</recordid><startdate>20050801</startdate><enddate>20050801</enddate><creator>Gupta, Ranjit</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050801</creationdate><title>The Recent Anti-Secession Law of the PRC</title><author>Gupta, Ranjit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-a50d8582e0660e428a86540411865f294f4076eadda93e5a971e1656286d2c6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>China</topic><topic>Communist parties</topic><topic>Deterrence</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Nationalism</topic><topic>Peoples Republic of China</topic><topic>Secession</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>Taiwan</topic><topic>Territorial disputes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Ranjit</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>China report (New Delhi)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gupta, Ranjit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Recent Anti-Secession Law of the PRC: A Comment</atitle><jtitle>China report (New Delhi)</jtitle><date>2005-08-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>289</spage><epage>297</epage><pages>289-297</pages><issn>0009-4455</issn><eissn>0973-063X</eissn><coden>CHRPAX</coden><abstract>The Anti-Secession Law was adopted on 14 March 2005, the final day of the annual session of the National People's Congress of the PRC. This Taiwan-specific piece of legislation overshadowed Jiang Zemin's final exit from the political scene and can be considered as the most important business transacted at this session. This Chinese move has attracted considerable international attention in the media, amongst China scholars and from foreign governments. However, there is widespread divergence of views regarding the motivations for this action, its timing, its real import and potential consequences.</abstract><cop>B-42, Panchsheel Enclave, New Delhi</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/000944550504100305</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-4455
ispartof China report (New Delhi), 2005-08, Vol.41 (3), p.289-297
issn 0009-4455
0973-063X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59721878
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sage Journals Online
subjects China
Communist parties
Deterrence
Law
Nationalism
Peoples Republic of China
Secession
Sovereignty
Taiwan
Territorial disputes
title The Recent Anti-Secession Law of the PRC: A Comment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T13%3A45%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Recent%20Anti-Secession%20Law%20of%20the%20PRC:%20A%20Comment&rft.jtitle=China%20report%20(New%20Delhi)&rft.au=Gupta,%20Ranjit&rft.date=2005-08-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=289&rft.epage=297&rft.pages=289-297&rft.issn=0009-4455&rft.eissn=0973-063X&rft.coden=CHRPAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/000944550504100305&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E59721878%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-a50d8582e0660e428a86540411865f294f4076eadda93e5a971e1656286d2c6e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=37767879&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_000944550504100305&rfr_iscdi=true