Can Stratarchically Organized Parties be Democratic? The Canadian Case

In this paper we are concerned with the fundamental question of internal party democracy. Must political parties that depend upon a substantial membership inevitably end as oligarchies? Has the emergence of the cartel party, the "public utility" of modern democracies, spelled an end to act...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of elections, public opinion and parties public opinion and parties, 2006-07, Vol.16 (2), p.93-114
Main Authors: Carty, R. Kenneth, Cross, William
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Audit
Canada
Candidates
Democracy
Elections
Institutions
Membership
Oligarchy
Organization
Party membership
Political Parties
Public Utilities
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this paper we are concerned with the fundamental question of internal party democracy. Must political parties that depend upon a substantial membership inevitably end as oligarchies? Has the emergence of the cartel party, the "public utility" of modern democracies, spelled an end to active citizen-partisans? To approach this issue we explore the cartel theorists' suggestion that stratarchical organizational forms might provide parties with a way out of an apparent democratic dead end. The paper considers the logic of such parties and then examines how Canadian parties have been organized around stratarchical principles. The second substantial part of the paper turns to an assessment, in terms of the standards adopted by the Canadian Democratic Audit, of how, and to what extent, these parties might be considered democratic institutions.
ISSN:1745-7289
1745-7297
DOI:10.1080/13689880600715912