Community Participation the Tanzanian Way: Conceptual Contiguity or Power Struggle?

In Tanzania, at least two contradictory meanings of participation are circulating amongst development workers. One, concerning "empowerment" and the facilitation of local decision-making, is associated with international development discourse; the other, concerning the obligation of Tanzan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oxford development studies 2006-03, Vol.34 (1), p.65-79
Main Author: Marsland, Rebecca
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anthropological research
Community Involvement
Community participation
Competition
Conceptualization
Credit
Decision making
Development projects
Discourse analysis
Empowerment
Ethnography
Local communities
Local Politics
Malaria
Power relations
Tanzania
Volunteers
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In Tanzania, at least two contradictory meanings of participation are circulating amongst development workers. One, concerning "empowerment" and the facilitation of local decision-making, is associated with international development discourse; the other, concerning the obligation of Tanzanian citizens to contribute to the development of the nation, can be traced back to the philosophy of Julius Nyerere. This article explores these meanings through an ethnographic study of a community malaria control project in the south-west of Tanzania. The practices of Tanzanian and expatriate development workers are distanced enough for these disparate versions of participation to run together without difficulty; but, when the two versions were brought together, tensions between community and local politics resulted, as there was competition to gain control and take the credit for the commodities associated with development. Nevertheless, this fissure did not prevent the project volunteers from taking on the locally prevailing discourse of development experts, which disparages local knowledge.
ISSN:1360-0818
1469-9966
DOI:10.1080/13600810500496053