Loading…
Legitimate Control and “Organizational Transcendence”
Organizations as collectives act in ways not predictable from their members' attitudes. This paper argues that, contrary to Michels (1962), such organizational transcendence of members' attitudes may be a legitimate result of organized pursuit of collective goals. The legitimacy of “organi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Social forces 1975-09, Vol.54 (1), p.199-211 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Organizations as collectives act in ways not predictable from their members' attitudes. This paper argues that, contrary to Michels (1962), such organizational transcendence of members' attitudes may be a legitimate result of organized pursuit of collective goals. The legitimacy of “organizational transcendence” (a variety of emergence) is explored in the context of local churches' efforts for racial justice, including their responses to the 1969 “Black Manifesto.” The relationships between organizational transcendence and two types of legitimate control, formal and attributed legitimacy, are discussed. While both are related to transcendence, attributed legitimacy appears more directly so. Formal legitimacy is conducive to the maintenance of attributed legitimacy, which mediates much of its effect on transcendence. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0037-7732 1534-7605 |
DOI: | 10.1093/sf/54.1.199 |