Loading…
Nature, Value Theory, and Sustainability of Capitalism
A comment on Andriana Vlachou's 2002 essay, "Nature and Value Theory," praises her for clarifying the determination of certain forms of rent & illustrating the analytical power of the labor theory of value in relation to environmental degradation. However, it is argued that Vlacho...
Saved in:
Published in: | Science & society (New York. 1936) 2003-12, Vol.67 (4), p.462-480 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | A comment on Andriana Vlachou's 2002 essay, "Nature and Value Theory," praises her for clarifying the determination of certain forms of rent & illustrating the analytical power of the labor theory of value in relation to environmental degradation. However, it is argued that Vlachou goes beyond rejecting the absolutist & metaphysical presentation of "natural limits" in (neo) Malthusian approaches to ignore ecological/social limits to capitalist production. Consequently, she nullifies the "cumulative transformation of quantitative into qualitative changes, and vice versa." The result is an "environmentally laissez faire Marxism" & an "unjustified trans-historical optimism." Other issues discussed include Vlachou's erroneous identification of an ecological catastrophe with Paul Burkett (1966) & other Marxists; her incorrect assumption that the potential of capitalism to postpone crisis is infinite; & her inadequate exploration of the implications of a continuing "inflation" of values & prices as the result of a serious decline in the "regulating natural conditions of production." The political implications of Vlachou's approach are considered. 9 References. J. Lindroth |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0036-8237 1943-2801 |
DOI: | 10.1521/siso.67.4.462.25330 |