Loading…

The Weak Effect of Imprisonment on Crime: 1971-1998

Objective. This article studies the impact of increasing incarceration rates on crime rates. First we seek to replicate the findings of previous studies utilizing the pooled, fixed-effects models (which are based on the assumption that the effect of imprisonment does not vary across states). Next we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social science quarterly 2002-09, Vol.83 (3), p.635-653
Main Authors: DeFina, Robert H., Arvanites, Thomas M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5626-8bb2af63c1dfed55028a453d1b6888f789f87e16c2b1c97eb2628e76af76c13d3
cites
container_end_page 653
container_issue 3
container_start_page 635
container_title Social science quarterly
container_volume 83
creator DeFina, Robert H.
Arvanites, Thomas M.
description Objective. This article studies the impact of increasing incarceration rates on crime rates. First we seek to replicate the findings of previous studies utilizing the pooled, fixed-effects models (which are based on the assumption that the effect of imprisonment does not vary across states). Next we test the validity of this assumption. Finally, we present a new methodology to examine the imprisonment-crime relationship. Methods. Annual state-level data from 1971—1998 are used to estimate 51 state-specific regression models in which crime rates for seven major categories are functions of incarceration rates and a wide array of socioeconomic and dummy control variables. Results. Our findings are consistent with prior studies. More important, the assumptions upon which the fixed-effect models are based were found to be statistically invalid. The results of our new methodology reveal that imprisonment rates are not significantly related to crime in the majority of states for any of the seven crimes studied. Conclusions. Because the state-level lagged imprisonment coefficients varied from significant negative effects to significant positive effects (depending on the state and type of crime), we argue that it is inappropriate to speak about "the" effect of imprisonment on any particular crime or at the national level.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1540-6237.00106
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60450323</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42955814</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>42955814</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5626-8bb2af63c1dfed55028a453d1b6888f789f87e16c2b1c97eb2628e76af76c13d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctvEzEQxi1EJULLmRPSigO3bccev5YbitrSKkChrXq0vI6tbrqP1N4A-e9xWJQDl1gaj-z5fePHR8hbCqc0jzMqOJSSoToFoCBfkNl-5yWZAaAuecXpK_I6pRUAcMb1jODdoy8evH0qzkPwbiyGUFx169ikoe98n9d9MY9N5z8WtFK0pFWlT8hRsG3yb_7lY3J_cX43_1wuvl1ezT8tSickk6Wua2aDREeXwS-FAKYtF7iktdRaB6WroJWn0rGaukr5mkmmvZI2KOkoLvGYfJj6ruPwvPFpNF2TnG9b2_thk4wELgAZHgSF4kIjsIMgVpRyrWkG3_8HroZN7PNrDQOOQknUGTqbIBeHlKIPJv9bZ-PWUDA7T8zOAbNzwPz1JCuuJ0X0a-_2eN3aNLjkGvPToNWYp20OBsByanLsttY5JAojBZrHscvN-NTsV9P67aGzze3t9_vpDu8m2SqNQ9zLOKuE0JTnejnVmzT63_u6jU9GKlTCPHy9NF9urn8Av7kwC_wDrs-6dw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204357638</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Weak Effect of Imprisonment on Crime: 1971-1998</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>Wiley</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>DeFina, Robert H. ; Arvanites, Thomas M.</creator><creatorcontrib>DeFina, Robert H. ; Arvanites, Thomas M.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. This article studies the impact of increasing incarceration rates on crime rates. First we seek to replicate the findings of previous studies utilizing the pooled, fixed-effects models (which are based on the assumption that the effect of imprisonment does not vary across states). Next we test the validity of this assumption. Finally, we present a new methodology to examine the imprisonment-crime relationship. Methods. Annual state-level data from 1971—1998 are used to estimate 51 state-specific regression models in which crime rates for seven major categories are functions of incarceration rates and a wide array of socioeconomic and dummy control variables. Results. Our findings are consistent with prior studies. More important, the assumptions upon which the fixed-effect models are based were found to be statistically invalid. The results of our new methodology reveal that imprisonment rates are not significantly related to crime in the majority of states for any of the seven crimes studied. Conclusions. Because the state-level lagged imprisonment coefficients varied from significant negative effects to significant positive effects (depending on the state and type of crime), we argue that it is inappropriate to speak about "the" effect of imprisonment on any particular crime or at the national level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-4941</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6237</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1540-6237.00106</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSQTAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Inc</publisher><subject>California ; Coefficients ; Control variables ; Correlation ; Crime ; Crime and Punishment ; Crime prevention ; Crime rate ; Crime Rates ; Criminal punishment ; Criminal sentences ; Criminal statistics ; Drug related crimes ; Estimation ; Historical analysis ; Hypotheses ; Imprisonment ; Larceny ; Legislation ; Null hypothesis ; Political systems ; Prisons ; Property crimes ; Replication ; Replication studies ; Research Methodology ; Social conditions &amp; trends ; Social sciences ; Texas ; Time series ; U.S.A ; USA ; Validity ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Social science quarterly, 2002-09, Vol.83 (3), p.635-653</ispartof><rights>2002 Southwestern Social Science Association</rights><rights>2002 The Southwestern Social Science Association</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Sep 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5626-8bb2af63c1dfed55028a453d1b6888f789f87e16c2b1c97eb2628e76af76c13d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42955814$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42955814$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31000,33223,33224,33774,33775,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/blasocsci/v_3a83_3ay_3a2002_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a635-653.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DeFina, Robert H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arvanites, Thomas M.</creatorcontrib><title>The Weak Effect of Imprisonment on Crime: 1971-1998</title><title>Social science quarterly</title><description>Objective. This article studies the impact of increasing incarceration rates on crime rates. First we seek to replicate the findings of previous studies utilizing the pooled, fixed-effects models (which are based on the assumption that the effect of imprisonment does not vary across states). Next we test the validity of this assumption. Finally, we present a new methodology to examine the imprisonment-crime relationship. Methods. Annual state-level data from 1971—1998 are used to estimate 51 state-specific regression models in which crime rates for seven major categories are functions of incarceration rates and a wide array of socioeconomic and dummy control variables. Results. Our findings are consistent with prior studies. More important, the assumptions upon which the fixed-effect models are based were found to be statistically invalid. The results of our new methodology reveal that imprisonment rates are not significantly related to crime in the majority of states for any of the seven crimes studied. Conclusions. Because the state-level lagged imprisonment coefficients varied from significant negative effects to significant positive effects (depending on the state and type of crime), we argue that it is inappropriate to speak about "the" effect of imprisonment on any particular crime or at the national level.</description><subject>California</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Control variables</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Crime and Punishment</subject><subject>Crime prevention</subject><subject>Crime rate</subject><subject>Crime Rates</subject><subject>Criminal punishment</subject><subject>Criminal sentences</subject><subject>Criminal statistics</subject><subject>Drug related crimes</subject><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Historical analysis</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Larceny</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Null hypothesis</subject><subject>Political systems</subject><subject>Prisons</subject><subject>Property crimes</subject><subject>Replication</subject><subject>Replication studies</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Social conditions &amp; trends</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Texas</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>0038-4941</issn><issn>1540-6237</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctvEzEQxi1EJULLmRPSigO3bccev5YbitrSKkChrXq0vI6tbrqP1N4A-e9xWJQDl1gaj-z5fePHR8hbCqc0jzMqOJSSoToFoCBfkNl-5yWZAaAuecXpK_I6pRUAcMb1jODdoy8evH0qzkPwbiyGUFx169ikoe98n9d9MY9N5z8WtFK0pFWlT8hRsG3yb_7lY3J_cX43_1wuvl1ezT8tSickk6Wua2aDREeXwS-FAKYtF7iktdRaB6WroJWn0rGaukr5mkmmvZI2KOkoLvGYfJj6ruPwvPFpNF2TnG9b2_thk4wELgAZHgSF4kIjsIMgVpRyrWkG3_8HroZN7PNrDQOOQknUGTqbIBeHlKIPJv9bZ-PWUDA7T8zOAbNzwPz1JCuuJ0X0a-_2eN3aNLjkGvPToNWYp20OBsByanLsttY5JAojBZrHscvN-NTsV9P67aGzze3t9_vpDu8m2SqNQ9zLOKuE0JTnejnVmzT63_u6jU9GKlTCPHy9NF9urn8Av7kwC_wDrs-6dw</recordid><startdate>200209</startdate><enddate>200209</enddate><creator>DeFina, Robert H.</creator><creator>Arvanites, Thomas M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Southwestern Social Science Association</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200209</creationdate><title>The Weak Effect of Imprisonment on Crime: 1971-1998</title><author>DeFina, Robert H. ; Arvanites, Thomas M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5626-8bb2af63c1dfed55028a453d1b6888f789f87e16c2b1c97eb2628e76af76c13d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>California</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Control variables</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Crime and Punishment</topic><topic>Crime prevention</topic><topic>Crime rate</topic><topic>Crime Rates</topic><topic>Criminal punishment</topic><topic>Criminal sentences</topic><topic>Criminal statistics</topic><topic>Drug related crimes</topic><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Historical analysis</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Larceny</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Null hypothesis</topic><topic>Political systems</topic><topic>Prisons</topic><topic>Property crimes</topic><topic>Replication</topic><topic>Replication studies</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Social conditions &amp; trends</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Texas</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DeFina, Robert H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arvanites, Thomas M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Social science quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DeFina, Robert H.</au><au>Arvanites, Thomas M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Weak Effect of Imprisonment on Crime: 1971-1998</atitle><jtitle>Social science quarterly</jtitle><date>2002-09</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>635</spage><epage>653</epage><pages>635-653</pages><issn>0038-4941</issn><eissn>1540-6237</eissn><coden>SSQTAL</coden><abstract>Objective. This article studies the impact of increasing incarceration rates on crime rates. First we seek to replicate the findings of previous studies utilizing the pooled, fixed-effects models (which are based on the assumption that the effect of imprisonment does not vary across states). Next we test the validity of this assumption. Finally, we present a new methodology to examine the imprisonment-crime relationship. Methods. Annual state-level data from 1971—1998 are used to estimate 51 state-specific regression models in which crime rates for seven major categories are functions of incarceration rates and a wide array of socioeconomic and dummy control variables. Results. Our findings are consistent with prior studies. More important, the assumptions upon which the fixed-effect models are based were found to be statistically invalid. The results of our new methodology reveal that imprisonment rates are not significantly related to crime in the majority of states for any of the seven crimes studied. Conclusions. Because the state-level lagged imprisonment coefficients varied from significant negative effects to significant positive effects (depending on the state and type of crime), we argue that it is inappropriate to speak about "the" effect of imprisonment on any particular crime or at the national level.</abstract><cop>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishers Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/1540-6237.00106</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-4941
ispartof Social science quarterly, 2002-09, Vol.83 (3), p.635-653
issn 0038-4941
1540-6237
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60450323
source EconLit s plnými texty; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; Wiley; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts
subjects California
Coefficients
Control variables
Correlation
Crime
Crime and Punishment
Crime prevention
Crime rate
Crime Rates
Criminal punishment
Criminal sentences
Criminal statistics
Drug related crimes
Estimation
Historical analysis
Hypotheses
Imprisonment
Larceny
Legislation
Null hypothesis
Political systems
Prisons
Property crimes
Replication
Replication studies
Research Methodology
Social conditions & trends
Social sciences
Texas
Time series
U.S.A
USA
Validity
Variables
title The Weak Effect of Imprisonment on Crime: 1971-1998
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A09%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Weak%20Effect%20of%20Imprisonment%20on%20Crime:%201971-1998&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20quarterly&rft.au=DeFina,%20Robert%20H.&rft.date=2002-09&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=635&rft.epage=653&rft.pages=635-653&rft.issn=0038-4941&rft.eissn=1540-6237&rft.coden=SSQTAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1540-6237.00106&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E42955814%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5626-8bb2af63c1dfed55028a453d1b6888f789f87e16c2b1c97eb2628e76af76c13d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204357638&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42955814&rfr_iscdi=true