The Effects of National Culture and Anonymity on Flaming and Criticalness in GSS-Supported Discussions

Technologies for supporting collaborative work are often developed to improve various aspects of group performance such as idea generation and decision quality; however, less attention has been given to the effects that such technology has upon the nature of group communication. In this article, we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Small group research 2004-12, Vol.35 (6), p.698-723
Main Authors: Reinig, Bruce A., Mejias, Roberto J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anonymity
Asian Cultural Groups
Biological and medical sciences
Computer Mediated Communication
Criticism
Crosscultural Differences
Cultural identity
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Group dynamics
Nationalism
North American Cultural Groups
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Social interactions. Communication. Group processes
Social psychology
Sociocultural Factors
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Technologies for supporting collaborative work are often developed to improve various aspects of group performance such as idea generation and decision quality; however, less attention has been given to the effects that such technology has upon the nature of group communication. In this article, we examine the phenomena of flaming and comment criticalness in computer-mediated communication as they occur in group support systems (GSS) supported discussions. A 2 X 2 factorial experimental design was used to examine the effects of national culture (U.S. and Hong Kong) and anonymity (identified and anonymous pen name) on the number of comments classified as flames and on the number of comments classified as critical in 39 GSS discussions. Experimental results indicate that both national culture and anonymity influence the number of critical comments occurring in such discussions. However, the findings were not significant with respect to the number of comments categorized as flames.
ISSN:1046-4964
1552-8278
DOI:10.1177/1046496404266773