Explaining Informal Work Groups in Complex Organizations: The Case for Autonomy in Structure

The concept autonomy is used as a major tool in an attempt to develop a theory of social integration of complex organizations that adequately handles informal patterns of workers. The argument runs as follows: Workers tend to have narrowly defined tasks; this permits a sphere of autonomy external to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Administrative science quarterly 1965-09, Vol.10 (2), p.204-223
Main Author: Katz, Fred E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Autonomous/Autonomy
Boredom
Factory labor
Group/Groups/Grouping/Groupism
ic (use same entry under 313850 from 1/79)
Informal organization
Manual labor
Orgasm
Social interaction
Social psychology
Social structures
Support personnel
Upper class
Worker/Workers
Writing
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The concept autonomy is used as a major tool in an attempt to develop a theory of social integration of complex organizations that adequately handles informal patterns of workers. The argument runs as follows: Workers tend to have narrowly defined tasks; this permits a sphere of autonomy external to work tasks but within the organization. The autonomy tends to be used to bring elements from the worker's culture into the organization. While giving the worker roots in the organization, this at the same time perpetuates his disenfranchisement from the bureaucratic sphere, since the working-class culture contains elements alien to the ethos of bureaucratic procedures. All this makes for a federalistic type of integration of the total organization, with worker allegiance and administrative control remaining distinctly problematical. The theoretical discussion is used to re-examine one of Donald Roy's studies of factory workers.
ISSN:0001-8392
DOI:10.2307/2391413