Loading…
Is Necessity the Mother of Intension?
Two approaches to the semantics of natural languages are considered & criticized: the "possible worlds" approach & the "sense" approach derived from Frege. The first yields semantic theories that "fail to meet reasonable conditions of adequacy," & is mistake...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Philosophical review 1977-01, Vol.86 (1), p.70-96 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Two approaches to the semantics of natural languages are considered & criticized: the "possible worlds" approach & the "sense" approach derived from Frege. The first yields semantic theories that "fail to meet reasonable conditions of adequacy," & is mistakenly based on identifying means & essence. Semantic properties & relations are classified & sense theories characterized in broad terms. Representational sense theories possess two components: a logical theory & a representation relation relating a lang's expressions to semantic representations. Two types of modal theories are distinguished: the "advertised" theory presented in opposition to sense theories, & the "real" theory found in formal systems which, it is argued, is a representational sense theory. The advertised theory is shown to be inadequate for the semantics of natural language & falls under the same criticism as the simple referential theory of meaning, ie, traditionally meaningful expressions without a referent become meaningless, & traditionally nonsynonymous expressions with the same referent become synonymous. Finally, it is shown how R. Montague's modal theory incorporates a representation of senses in the form of analysis trees. A. Orianne |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0031-8108 1558-1470 |
DOI: | 10.2307/2184163 |