Loading…
Public Administration, Science, and Risk Assessment: A Case Study of the U.K. Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy Crisis
The bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) outbreak in the United Kingdom is regarded as one of the worst public policy crises the British government has experienced during the postwar era. In material terms, it has led to the slaughter of 3.3 million cattle and estimated economic losses of £3.7 bil...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Public administration review 2005-07, Vol.65 (4), p.396-408 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5237-5eb0f9f79be6306f2e8f48c3c4b850cddecf6d6a10d7135eb655b6d653b7bb883 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5237-5eb0f9f79be6306f2e8f48c3c4b850cddecf6d6a10d7135eb655b6d653b7bb883 |
| container_end_page | 408 |
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 396 |
| container_title | Public administration review |
| container_volume | 65 |
| creator | Beck, Matthias Asenova, Darinka Dickson, Gordon |
| description | The bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) outbreak in the United Kingdom is regarded as one of the worst public policy crises the British government has experienced during the postwar era. In material terms, it has led to the slaughter of 3.3 million cattle and estimated economic losses of £3.7 billion. In administrative terms, the crisis brought about the dissolution of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. This article examines the institutional context in which decisions about the scientific evidence on BSE were made. The authors argue that a centralized system in which government agencies control science for government is inherently vulnerable to alliances of experts and interest groups that undermine the credible assessment of public health and safety risks. Specific societal conditions may encourage risk-opportunistic behavior among policy makers that is conducive to delays and inaction until such time as the evidence of a health risk becomes overwhelming. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00467.x |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60683207</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3542637</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3542637</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5237-5eb0f9f79be6306f2e8f48c3c4b850cddecf6d6a10d7135eb655b6d653b7bb883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkstu1DAYRiMEEkPhDVhYLFg1qS_xJUgswtALagWjlhHsrMRxGKdJHOyEzrw9DkGzYFO8seXvnF-yPkcRQDBBYZ01CaIpjBkOFxhCmkCYMp7sn0SrY_A0WkFISEwIxc-jF943ECKMUrGKps1UtkaBvOpMb_zoitHY_hTcKaN7pU9B0Vfg1vh7kHuvve90P74DOVgXXoO7caoOwNZg3GmwTa4T8MH-Mn0IBtv_MLV1HTgPU4Zd0dqhGHcHsHbGG_8yelYXrdev_u4n0fbi_Ov6Kr75cvlpnd_EimLCY6pLWGc1z0rNCGQ11qJOhSIqLQWFqqq0qlnFCgQrjkigGaVluKCk5GUpBDmJ3i5zB2d_TtqPsjNe6bYtem0nLxlkgmDIHwWJQCLNBHwURBxmmeBZAN_8AzZ2cn14rUQZRxylmAZILJBy1nunazk40xXuIBGUc72ykXOLcm5RzvXKP_XKfVDfL-qDafXhvz252ea34RT814vf-NG6o09oihmZ43iJw5_Q-2NcuHsZZE7lt8-X8iLbXH3HH6-lIL8Byg_C-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197171425</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Public Administration, Science, and Risk Assessment: A Case Study of the U.K. Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy Crisis</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Wiley</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Beck, Matthias ; Asenova, Darinka ; Dickson, Gordon</creator><creatorcontrib>Beck, Matthias ; Asenova, Darinka ; Dickson, Gordon</creatorcontrib><description>The bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) outbreak in the United Kingdom is regarded as one of the worst public policy crises the British government has experienced during the postwar era. In material terms, it has led to the slaughter of 3.3 million cattle and estimated economic losses of £3.7 billion. In administrative terms, the crisis brought about the dissolution of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. This article examines the institutional context in which decisions about the scientific evidence on BSE were made. The authors argue that a centralized system in which government agencies control science for government is inherently vulnerable to alliances of experts and interest groups that undermine the credible assessment of public health and safety risks. Specific societal conditions may encourage risk-opportunistic behavior among policy makers that is conducive to delays and inaction until such time as the evidence of a health risk becomes overwhelming.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3352</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00467.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PBARBM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Administrative centralization ; Agricultural policy ; Beef ; Bovine spongiform encephalopathy ; Case studies ; Cattle ; Communication ; Communication (Thought Transfer) ; Creutzfeldt Jakob syndrome ; Cross Cultural Studies ; Decision making ; Definitions ; Diseases ; Environmental policy ; Evidence ; Food Industry ; Government (Administrative Body) ; Government Agencies ; Government crises ; Government officials ; Interest groups ; Knowledge Level ; Lead Article ; Meats ; Networks ; Nuclear accidents & safety ; Organizational Effectiveness ; Policy analysis ; Policy making ; Political alliances ; Political crises ; Public administration ; Public Agencies ; Public Health ; Public officials ; Public Opinion ; Public policy ; Risk analysis ; Risk Assessment ; Risk management ; Science ; Social Environment ; Studies ; Ungulates ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Public administration review, 2005-07, Vol.65 (4), p.396-408</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 The American Society for Public Administration</rights><rights>Copyright American Society for Public Administration Jul/Aug 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5237-5eb0f9f79be6306f2e8f48c3c4b850cddecf6d6a10d7135eb655b6d653b7bb883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5237-5eb0f9f79be6306f2e8f48c3c4b850cddecf6d6a10d7135eb655b6d653b7bb883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/197171425/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/197171425?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11687,12844,12846,21377,21386,21393,27923,27924,33222,33223,33610,33611,33876,33877,33984,33985,36059,36060,43732,43879,43947,44362,58237,58470,73992,74168,74239,74666</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beck, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asenova, Darinka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Gordon</creatorcontrib><title>Public Administration, Science, and Risk Assessment: A Case Study of the U.K. Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy Crisis</title><title>Public administration review</title><description>The bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) outbreak in the United Kingdom is regarded as one of the worst public policy crises the British government has experienced during the postwar era. In material terms, it has led to the slaughter of 3.3 million cattle and estimated economic losses of £3.7 billion. In administrative terms, the crisis brought about the dissolution of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. This article examines the institutional context in which decisions about the scientific evidence on BSE were made. The authors argue that a centralized system in which government agencies control science for government is inherently vulnerable to alliances of experts and interest groups that undermine the credible assessment of public health and safety risks. Specific societal conditions may encourage risk-opportunistic behavior among policy makers that is conducive to delays and inaction until such time as the evidence of a health risk becomes overwhelming.</description><subject>Administrative centralization</subject><subject>Agricultural policy</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Bovine spongiform encephalopathy</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communication (Thought Transfer)</subject><subject>Creutzfeldt Jakob syndrome</subject><subject>Cross Cultural Studies</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Definitions</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Food Industry</subject><subject>Government (Administrative Body)</subject><subject>Government Agencies</subject><subject>Government crises</subject><subject>Government officials</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Lead Article</subject><subject>Meats</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Nuclear accidents & safety</subject><subject>Organizational Effectiveness</subject><subject>Policy analysis</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political alliances</subject><subject>Political crises</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Public Agencies</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Public officials</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Social Environment</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Ungulates</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0033-3352</issn><issn>1540-6210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkstu1DAYRiMEEkPhDVhYLFg1qS_xJUgswtALagWjlhHsrMRxGKdJHOyEzrw9DkGzYFO8seXvnF-yPkcRQDBBYZ01CaIpjBkOFxhCmkCYMp7sn0SrY_A0WkFISEwIxc-jF943ECKMUrGKps1UtkaBvOpMb_zoitHY_hTcKaN7pU9B0Vfg1vh7kHuvve90P74DOVgXXoO7caoOwNZg3GmwTa4T8MH-Mn0IBtv_MLV1HTgPU4Zd0dqhGHcHsHbGG_8yelYXrdev_u4n0fbi_Ov6Kr75cvlpnd_EimLCY6pLWGc1z0rNCGQ11qJOhSIqLQWFqqq0qlnFCgQrjkigGaVluKCk5GUpBDmJ3i5zB2d_TtqPsjNe6bYtem0nLxlkgmDIHwWJQCLNBHwURBxmmeBZAN_8AzZ2cn14rUQZRxylmAZILJBy1nunazk40xXuIBGUc72ykXOLcm5RzvXKP_XKfVDfL-qDafXhvz252ea34RT814vf-NG6o09oihmZ43iJw5_Q-2NcuHsZZE7lt8-X8iLbXH3HH6-lIL8Byg_C-g</recordid><startdate>200507</startdate><enddate>200507</enddate><creator>Beck, Matthias</creator><creator>Asenova, Darinka</creator><creator>Dickson, Gordon</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Society for Public Administration</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200507</creationdate><title>Public Administration, Science, and Risk Assessment: A Case Study of the U.K. Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy Crisis</title><author>Beck, Matthias ; Asenova, Darinka ; Dickson, Gordon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5237-5eb0f9f79be6306f2e8f48c3c4b850cddecf6d6a10d7135eb655b6d653b7bb883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Administrative centralization</topic><topic>Agricultural policy</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Bovine spongiform encephalopathy</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communication (Thought Transfer)</topic><topic>Creutzfeldt Jakob syndrome</topic><topic>Cross Cultural Studies</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Definitions</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Food Industry</topic><topic>Government (Administrative Body)</topic><topic>Government Agencies</topic><topic>Government crises</topic><topic>Government officials</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Lead Article</topic><topic>Meats</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Nuclear accidents & safety</topic><topic>Organizational Effectiveness</topic><topic>Policy analysis</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political alliances</topic><topic>Political crises</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Public Agencies</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Public officials</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Social Environment</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Ungulates</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beck, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asenova, Darinka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Gordon</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Public administration review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beck, Matthias</au><au>Asenova, Darinka</au><au>Dickson, Gordon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Public Administration, Science, and Risk Assessment: A Case Study of the U.K. Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy Crisis</atitle><jtitle>Public administration review</jtitle><date>2005-07</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>396</spage><epage>408</epage><pages>396-408</pages><issn>0033-3352</issn><eissn>1540-6210</eissn><coden>PBARBM</coden><abstract>The bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) outbreak in the United Kingdom is regarded as one of the worst public policy crises the British government has experienced during the postwar era. In material terms, it has led to the slaughter of 3.3 million cattle and estimated economic losses of £3.7 billion. In administrative terms, the crisis brought about the dissolution of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. This article examines the institutional context in which decisions about the scientific evidence on BSE were made. The authors argue that a centralized system in which government agencies control science for government is inherently vulnerable to alliances of experts and interest groups that undermine the credible assessment of public health and safety risks. Specific societal conditions may encourage risk-opportunistic behavior among policy makers that is conducive to delays and inaction until such time as the evidence of a health risk becomes overwhelming.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00467.x</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0033-3352 |
| ispartof | Public administration review, 2005-07, Vol.65 (4), p.396-408 |
| issn | 0033-3352 1540-6210 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60683207 |
| source | EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Business Source Ultimate; Wiley; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Politics Collection; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Education Collection |
| subjects | Administrative centralization Agricultural policy Beef Bovine spongiform encephalopathy Case studies Cattle Communication Communication (Thought Transfer) Creutzfeldt Jakob syndrome Cross Cultural Studies Decision making Definitions Diseases Environmental policy Evidence Food Industry Government (Administrative Body) Government Agencies Government crises Government officials Interest groups Knowledge Level Lead Article Meats Networks Nuclear accidents & safety Organizational Effectiveness Policy analysis Policy making Political alliances Political crises Public administration Public Agencies Public Health Public officials Public Opinion Public policy Risk analysis Risk Assessment Risk management Science Social Environment Studies Ungulates United Kingdom |
| title | Public Administration, Science, and Risk Assessment: A Case Study of the U.K. Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy Crisis |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T01%3A29%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Public%20Administration,%20Science,%20and%20Risk%20Assessment:%20A%20Case%20Study%20of%20the%20U.K.%20Bovine%20Spongiform%20Encephalopathy%20Crisis&rft.jtitle=Public%20administration%20review&rft.au=Beck,%20Matthias&rft.date=2005-07&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=396&rft.epage=408&rft.pages=396-408&rft.issn=0033-3352&rft.eissn=1540-6210&rft.coden=PBARBM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00467.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3542637%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5237-5eb0f9f79be6306f2e8f48c3c4b850cddecf6d6a10d7135eb655b6d653b7bb883%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197171425&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3542637&rfr_iscdi=true |