Loading…
Rationalizing the California Recall
Popular interpretations of the 2003 CA gubernatorial recall election as a typical gubernatorial election or as the Republican Party's manipulation of political processes are challenged. An overview of the recall election is presented, demonstrating its resemblance to initiatives, referenda, &am...
Saved in:
Published in: | PS, political science & politics political science & politics, 2004-01, Vol.37 (1), p.19-21 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Popular interpretations of the 2003 CA gubernatorial recall election as a typical gubernatorial election or as the Republican Party's manipulation of political processes are challenged. An overview of the recall election is presented, demonstrating its resemblance to initiatives, referenda, & primary elections. Analysis of the results of the 2002 general election & the 2003 recall election is conducted, indicating the effects of several indicators -- racial identity, employment status, support for Davis in the 2002 election, party affiliation, & support for Ross Perot in the 1992 US presidential election -- upon voters' preferences. Several findings are revealed: Latino American & African American voters withdrew their traditionally high level of support for Democrats; unemployment status had a greater effect upon support for Davis in the 2002 election; & support for Perot & support for Davis's recall were positively correlated. It is concluded that the CA recall election bears a strong resemblance to a referendum. 1 Table, 1 Figure, 1 Reference. J. W. Parker |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1049-0965 1537-5935 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S1049096504003555 |