Legislative Committees as Loyalty-Generating Institutions

The current debate over models of self-selection in Congress - whether Congressmen by-and-large find themselves on committees which most closely correspond to their constituents' interests - has implications for theories of Congressional organization. Building on recent findings which question...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public choice 1994-12, Vol.81 (3/4), p.195-221
Main Authors: Coker, David C., Crain, W. Mark
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bias
CHOICE, IN ANY CONTEXT
Committees
Congress
Congressional committees
Cooperation
Leadership
Legislation
LEGISLATIVE BODIES
Legislative process
Legislators
Loyalty
MODELING, MODELS
Organizational analysis
Party leadership
Political institutions
Political parties
Political support
Preferences
Seniority
Standing committees
Statistical variance
THEORY BUILDING OR THEORETICAL APPROACH
U.S.A
United States
VOTING
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The current debate over models of self-selection in Congress - whether Congressmen by-and-large find themselves on committees which most closely correspond to their constituents' interests - has implications for theories of Congressional organization. Building on recent findings which question a categorical self-selection process, in this paper we present a theory of committee function based on loyalty to party leaders. As a rationale for leadership privilege, and to provide context for our argument, we first present a theoretical framework based on a modified model of cooperation. We then focus on certain specifics of our leadership theory; that rank-and-file members vote leadership interests in exchange for leader support in gaining choice committee assignments and aid in passing legislation. This leads to predictions about voting patterns across committees. Static tests of these relations are performed, as well as those incorporating changes in voting patterns with seniority.
ISSN:0048-5829
1573-7101
DOI:10.1007/BF01053230