Retaliation Against Sexual Assault: Self-Defense or Public Duty?

The present study explored the notion that females would react more positively toward retaliation against sexual assault than males. In a 2 × 2 design, female and male undergraduates read a vignette in which either a rape victim or her fiance retaliated against the rapist by shooting him (nonfatally...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychology of women quarterly 1983-09, Vol.8 (1), p.89-99
Main Authors: Towson, Shelagh M. J., Zanna, Mark P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biological and medical sciences
Medical sciences
Moral Judgment
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Punishment
Sex Differences
Sexual Assault
Victimology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The present study explored the notion that females would react more positively toward retaliation against sexual assault than males. In a 2 × 2 design, female and male undergraduates read a vignette in which either a rape victim or her fiance retaliated against the rapist by shooting him (nonfatally). Results indicated that females regarded the retaliatory act as more morally justified than did males and were consistently more lenient in their legal judgments of the retaliator. Correlational analyses indicated that attributing retaliation to the motives of self-defense (for the victim) and “public duty” (for the fiance) may have mediated these judgments. Implications of these findings for the psychology of moral judgment and the legal system are discussed.
ISSN:0361-6843
1471-6402
DOI:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1983.tb00620.x