Loading…

Abdominoperineal resection or low Hartmann's procedure

Aim:  To compare patients having low Hartmann's resection (LHP) with abdominoperineal resection (APR) by investigating postoperative complications. Methods:  Retrospective comparative analysis of preoperative state and postoperative course for patients having surgery from 1 January 1997 to 1 Ju...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:ANZ journal of surgery 2004-07, Vol.74 (7), p.537-540
Main Authors: Frye, John N. R., Carne, Peter W. G., Robertson, Greg M., Frizelle, Frank A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim:  To compare patients having low Hartmann's resection (LHP) with abdominoperineal resection (APR) by investigating postoperative complications. Methods:  Retrospective comparative analysis of preoperative state and postoperative course for patients having surgery from 1 January 1997 to 1 July 2001, by the surgeons of the Colorectal Unit, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand. Results:  Over a 54‐month period 65 patients underwent either LHP or APR (29 LHP, 36 APR). The median age/sex (male:female) of patients for LHP was 76 years (51−90 years) (14:15), for APR 72 years (31−93 years) (19:17). The indication for surgery was predominantly cancer (LHP 89.6%, APR 94.4%). There was a high rate of preoperative comorbidities: LHP 75.9% (cardiac 62.1%, pulmonary 17.2%), APR 75% (cardiac 50%, pulmonary 15.9%). Preoperative chemoradiation was used in 10.3% of patients having LHP and 30.6% with APR. There was no difference in postoperative non‐septic complications. There was a significant difference in the types of septic complications (P = 0.018), with a higher rate of pelvic abscesses after LHP (5). Perineal wound infection occurred in five patients having APR (14.3%). The median time to heal a perineal wound was 1 month (0.5−7 months). The median length of stay was 13 days for LHP (5−33 days) and 11 days for APR (6−19 days)(P = 0.0266). Conclusion:  This non‐randomized, retrospective, cohort study shows a surprisingly high rate of pelvic abscesses after LHP compared with APR. Perineal wound healing was a problem after APR, but less of a management problem than the septic complications after LHP. Both LHP and APR might be associated with significant morbidity. A high pelvic abscess rate following LHP is associated with a high likelihood of further surgical intervention and a prolonged length of stay.
ISSN:1445-1433
1445-2197
DOI:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2004.03055.x