Loading…

Haemodynamics and electrolyte balance: a comparison between on-line pre-dilution haemofiltration and haemodialysis

Background. An important advantage of convective therapies is improved vascular reactivity. However, it is not well known whether the vascular response during convective therapies remains superior when compared to haemodialysis (HD) with an adjusted temperature of the dialysate. It has also been sug...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation dialysis, transplantation, 2004-09, Vol.19 (9), p.2354-2359
Main Authors: Beerenhout, Charles, Dejagere, Tom, van der Sande, Frank M., Bekers, Otto, Leunissen, Karel M., Kooman, Jeroen P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background. An important advantage of convective therapies is improved vascular reactivity. However, it is not well known whether the vascular response during convective therapies remains superior when compared to haemodialysis (HD) with an adjusted temperature of the dialysate. It has also been suggested that convective therapies may impair small electrolyte removal through an effect on the Donnan equilibrium. In the present study, we compared the haemodynamic response and small electrolyte removal between pre-dilution on-line haemofiltration (HF) and HD procedures. Methods. Cardiac output (CO), central blood volume (CBV) and peripheral vascular resistance (PVR) were assessed, using the saline dilution technique, in 12 stable patients during HF and HD with two different temperatures of the dialysate [36.5 and 35.5°C (HD36.5 and HD35.5)]. Balances for sodium, potassium, calcium and conductivity were assessed using total dialysate/filtrate collections. Target filtration volume for HF was 1.2 times body weight. The temperature of the infusate was 36.5°C. Results. The change (Δ) in CBV was less during HD with a dialysate temperature of 35.5°C (−0.03±0.14 l; P
ISSN:0931-0509
1460-2385
DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfh315