Addition of an arch support improves the biomechanical effect of a laterally wedged insole

• Published in: Gait & posture 2009-02, Vol.29 (2), p.208-213
• Main Authors: Nakajima, Kohei, Kakihana, Wataru, Nakagawa, Takumi, Mitomi, Hiroyuki, Hikita, Atsuhiko, Suzuki, Ryuji, Akai, Masami, Iwaya, Tsutomu, Nakamura, Kozo, Fukui, Naoshi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Arch support; Biomechanical Phenomena; Equipment Design; Female; Gait; Gait analysis; Humans; Knee; Knee Joint - physiopathology; Laterally wedged insole; Male; Orthopedics; Orthotic Devices; Osteoarthritis; Osteoarthritis, Knee - physiopathology; Shoes; Subtalar Joint - physiopathology; Walking - physiology
• ISSN: 0966-6362; 1879-2219
• DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.08.007

Abstract In order to examine if the addition of an arch support could improve the biomechanical effect of the laterally wedged insole, three-dimensional gait analysis was performed on 20 healthy volunteers. Kinetic and kinematic parameters at the knee and subtalar joints were compared among the following four types of insoles; a 5-mm thick flat insole, a flat insole with an arch support (AS), a 6° inclined laterally wedged insole (LW), and a laterally wedged insole with an arch support (LWAS). The knee adduction moment averaged for the entire stance phase was reduced by the use of LW and LWAS by 7.7% and 13.3%, respectively, from that with FLAT. The difference in knee adduction moment between LW and LWAS was most obvious in the late stance, which was ascribed to the difference in the progression angle between those insoles. The analyses also revealed that LW tended to increase step width, and that such an increase was completely eliminated by the addition of an arch support to LW. This reduction of step width could be another mechanism for the further reduction of the moment with LWAS. The analyses of biomechanical parameters at the subtalar joints suggested that LWAS allowed the subject to walk in a more natural manner, while exerting greater biomechanical effects than LW. Thus, the addition of an arch support to the laterally wedged insole reduced knee adduction moment more efficiently, possibly through the elimination of potential negative effects of the laterally wedged insole.