Loading…
Joint effect of physical activity and body mass index on mortality for acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: role of preinfarction angina as equivalent of ischemic preconditioning
Background Preinfarction angina (PrA), clinical equivalent of ischemic preconditioning, confers protection against in-hospital mortality for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in adult but not in elderly patients. This study aims to examine the interaction between physical activity and body mass inde...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation 2009-02, Vol.16 (1), p.73-79 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Preinfarction angina (PrA), clinical equivalent of ischemic preconditioning, confers protection against in-hospital mortality for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in adult but not in elderly patients. This study aims to examine the interaction between physical activity and body mass index (BMI) in preserving the cardioprotective effect of PrA in elderly patients with AMI.
Design
Elderly patients (≥ 65 years old) with AMI admitted to Coronary Care Unit.
Methods
Elderly patients with AMI were retrospectively stratified for the presence and absence of PrA, and for quartiles of BMI and physical activity. In-hospital outcomes (death, cardiogenic shock, and reinfarction and creatine kinase-MB peak) were evaluated.
Results
In-hospital mortality of 1014 elderly patients with AMI was 19.2% in those with PrA and 22.7% in those without (P = 0.18, NS). Mortality further decreased with increased physical activity and reduced BMI, a trend that was not observed in patients without PrA. When physical activity and BMI were considered together, lowest in-hospital mortality was observed in patients with highest physical activity and normal BMI (from 18.2 to 9.6%; P < 0.01) with the greatest reduction observed in patients with PrA (from 18.3 to 5.1%; P = 0.02). Multivariate analysis showed that PrA did not exert a protective effect in all patients irrespective of physical activity and BMI. A protective role was, however, observed in patients with highest physical activity or normal BMI and reached a maximum protective role in patients who showed both highest physical activity and normal BMI [odds ratio = 0.08; 95% confidence interval = 0.02-0.72; P < 0.01].
Conclusion
The cardioprotective effect of PrA was preserved in elderly patients who showed the highest physical activity and a normal BMI. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 16:73-79 © 2009 The European Society of Cardiology |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2047-4873 1741-8267 2047-4881 1741-8275 |
DOI: | 10.1097/HJR.0b013e32831e9525 |