Fear-avoidance- and endurance-related responses to pain: Development and validation of the Avoidance-Endurance Questionnaire (AEQ)

• Published in: European journal of pain 2009-07, Vol.13 (6), p.620-628
• Main Authors: Hasenbring, Monika I, Hallner, Dirk, Rusu, Adina C
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adaptation, Psychological - physiology; Adult; Affective responses; Anesthesia & Perioperative Care; Anxiety - psychology; Avoidance-endurance model; Cognition - physiology; Depression - psychology; Disability Evaluation; Emotions - physiology; Fear - physiology; Female; Humans; Low back pain; Low Back Pain - psychology; Male; Middle Aged; Pain Measurement; Pain Medicine; Pain-related cognitions; Pain-related coping; Physical Endurance - physiology; Reproducibility of Results; Socioeconomic Factors; Surveys and Questionnaires
• ISSN: 1090-3801; 1532-2149
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.11.001

Abstract Aim of investigation: Recent research indicated wide variability regarding pain-related cognitive/affective and behavioral responses to pain, showing that fear-avoidance responses (FAR) and endurance-responses (ER) play a prominent role in the maintenance of low back pain (LBP). Until now, there is a lack of reliable and valid instruments covering FAR and ER. Methods A pool of 60 items, derived from the Kiel Pain Inventory was answered by 191 LBP patients. Principle components analyses (PCA) was used to explore the factor structure creating the Avoidance-Endurance Questionnaire (AEQ). Validity was calculated using the criteria variables pain intensity, disability, chronic pain grades (CPG) and number of sick days, further self-report measures (Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire FABQ, Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale PASS, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia TSK and Beck Depression Inventory BDI) evaluating construct validity. Results PCA revealed five AEQ–FAR scales with anxiety/depression, catastrophizing, help-/hopelessness, avoidance of social activities, avoidance of physical activities, and four AEQ–ER scales with positive mood, thought suppression, pain persistence behavior and humor/distraction. All scales revealed high internal consistency. As expected, FAR scales showed positive associations with pain, disability and other FAR variables (correlations between r = .26 and r = .58), whereas ER scales showed negative associations (between r = −.19 and −.48). The only exception referred to positive correlations between both, FAR and ER and pain intensity. Conclusions The AEQ has shown as a reliable and valid measure to assess pattern of fear-avoidance and endurance-related responses to pain. Both aspects seem to play a role in the maintenance of LBP.