Loading…

The Moderating Influence of Procedural Fairness on the Relationship Between Work-Life Conflict and Organizational Commitment

To help employees better manage work-life conflict, organizations have introduced various initiatives, which have met with mixed results. The present studies examined the utility of a procedurally based approach to understanding employees' reactions to work-life conflict. The authors examined w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied psychology 2005-01, Vol.90 (1), p.13-24
Main Authors: Siegel, Phyllis A, Post, Corinne, Brockner, Joel, Fishman, Ariel Y, Garden, Charlee
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To help employees better manage work-life conflict, organizations have introduced various initiatives, which have met with mixed results. The present studies examined the utility of a procedurally based approach to understanding employees' reactions to work-life conflict. The authors examined whether the fairness of procedures used by organizational authorities to plan and implement decisions moderates the (inverse) relationship between work-life conflict and employees' organizational commitment. Three studies using different methodologies showed support for the moderating role played by procedural fairness. That is, the tendency for greater work-life conflict to lead to lower commitment was significantly less pronounced when procedural fairness was high rather than low. Theoretical contributions to the work-life conflict and organizational justice literatures are discussed, as are practical implications.
ISSN:0021-9010
1939-1854
DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.13