How does nose blowing effect the computed tomography of paranasal sinuses in chronic sinusitis?

• Published in: European journal of radiology 2005-02, Vol.53 (2), p.182-188
• Main Authors: Savranlar, Ahmet, Uzun, Lokman, Ugur, Mehmet Birol, Mahmutyazicioglu, Kamran, Ozer, Tulay, Gundogdu, Sadi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Biological and medical sciences; Blowing; Chronic sinusitis; Computed tomography; Female; Humans; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Nasal Cavity - physiology; Nasal Decongestants - administration & dosage; Non tumoral diseases; Nose; Otorhinolaryngology (head neck, general aspects and miscellaneous); Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology; Paranasal sinus; Paranasal Sinuses - diagnostic imaging; Sinusitis - diagnostic imaging; Statistics, Nonparametric; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
• ISSN: 0720-048X; 1872-7727
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.04.003

Objective: Our aim was to determine whether inward or outward movement of the secretions in the paranasal sinuses due to nose blowing after nasal decongestion has any effect on the paranasal sinus computed tomography (CT) images in patients with sinusitis and to asses whether nose blowing may result in misdiagnosis or overdiagnosis in radiological evaluation of sinusitis. Materials and methods: Twenty-four patients with chronic sinusitis were evaluated in an academic tertiary care hospital and data were collected prospectively. After coronal sinus computed tomography scans were performed at 100 mA setting which was half the value of the standard radiation dose suggested by the manufacturer, topical decongestion was applied to each nostril followed by nose blowing 10 min later. Sinus CT scans were then repeated at the same setting. We evaluated the mucosal thickness of medial, lateral, superior and inferior maxillary and frontal sinus walls and the maximal thickness in anterior ethmoidal cells. The measurements prior to and following nose blowing were compared with Wilcoxon signed ranks test. The obtained images were also staged using Lund–McKay staging system separately and the scores were compared with Student’s t-test. Results: We observed a tendency towards reduction in mucosal thickness after nose blowing. There were statistically significant differences between maxillary sinus inferior wall and frontal sinus inferior wall mucosal thickness values prior to and after nose blowing. The difference however was very small, about 0.5 mm in magnitude and Lund–McKay score did not change in any of the patients after nose blowing. Conclusion: Nose blowing and topical nasal decongestion does not have any effect on the diagnostic accuracy of sinus CT in chronic sinusitis patients.