Loading…

Inadequate hemodynamic management in patients undergoing interfacility transfer for suspected aortic dissection

The study goal was the analysis of effectiveness of hemodynamic management of patients undergoing interfacility transport for suspected acute aortic dissection (SAAD). Our retrospective, consecutive-case review examined 62 nonhypotensive patients transported by an air emergency medical services (EMS...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of emergency medicine 2005, Vol.23 (1), p.24-29
Main Authors: Winsor, Greg, Thomas, Stephen H., Biddinger, Paul D., Wedel, Suzanne K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The study goal was the analysis of effectiveness of hemodynamic management of patients undergoing interfacility transport for suspected acute aortic dissection (SAAD). Our retrospective, consecutive-case review examined 62 nonhypotensive patients transported by an air emergency medical services (EMS) service during 1998 to 2002, with referral hospital diagnosis of SAAD. Of patients with systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than 120 upon air EMS arrival, antihypertensives had been given in only 23/42 (54.8%). In 19 cases where pretransport SBP is less than 120, with no referral hospital antihypertensive therapy given, median pretransport SBP was 158 (range, 122-212). In 20/62 cases (32.3%), the air EMS agency instituted antihypertensive therapy, which was successful; of 42 cases with pretransport SBP less than 120, mean intratransport SBP decrement was 24 (95% confidence interval, 16-32). In patients undergoing transport for SAAD, pretransport hemodynamic therapy was frequently omitted and often inadequate, generating an opportunity for air EMS intervention. Education to improve SAAD care should focus upon both referral hospitals and transport services.
ISSN:0735-6757
1532-8171
DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2004.01.008