Sagittal plane moment arms of the female lumbar region rectus abdominis in an upright neutral torso posture

• Published in: Clinical biomechanics (Bristol) 2005-03, Vol.20 (3), p.242-246
• Main Authors: Jorgensen, Michael J., Marras, William S., Smith, Francis W., Pope, Malcolm H.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abdomen - anatomy & histology; Abdomen - physiology; Adult; Biomechanical modeling; Female; Humans; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods; Lumbar Vertebrae - anatomy & histology; Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Moment arms; Positional MRI; Posture - physiology; Rectus abdominis; Rectus Abdominis - anatomy & histology; Rectus Abdominis - physiology; Supine Position - physiology; Torque; Torso
• ISSN: 0268-0033; 1879-1271
• DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.10.009

Background. Prior imaging studies of torso muscle moment arms for use as inputs into biomechanical models have been derived from subjects lying supine. Recent research suggests moment arms of the rectus abdominis are larger when standing versus lying supine. Methods. Axial MRI images, through and parallel to the intervertebral discs were obtained from five females in a standing upright neutral posture. Digitizing software was utilized to quantify the distance in the sagittal plane between the centroids of the intervertebral disc and the rectus abdominis muscle, and converted to the transverse plane to allow comparisons with studies with subjects in a supine posture. Findings. The mean sagittal plane moment arms in the transverse plane were 9.7, 9.1, 8.5, 8.5 and 9.8 cm at the L 1/L 2, L 2/L 3, L 3/L 4, L 4/L 5 and L 5/S 1 intervertebral levels, respectively. Compared with a study on females of a similar age group, the moment arms from this study were larger at each level, increasing from 7.3% larger at L 1/L 2 to 43.7% larger at L 5/S 1. Interpretation. Accurate anatomical geometrical representation in biomechanical models is necessary for valid estimates of internal loading. Sagittal plane rectus abdominis moment arms were larger from the upright neutral torso posture in this study compared to studies with subjects lying supine. This suggests the torso internal moment generating capability would be represented differently in biomechanical models that use data from studies where subjects were upright, which is more reflective of the postures biomechanical models are utilized for, than when using anatomical geometry derived from supine postures.