Loading…
Gender differences in growth hormone response to exercise before and after rhGH administration and the effect of rhGH on the hormone profile of fit normal adults
Summary Objectives Exercise is a potent physiological stimulus of GH secretion. We hypothesized that exogenous recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) administration through an increase in GH and IGF‐I levels would blunt the GH response to exercise. The aim of the study was to examine and compare t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical endocrinology (Oxford) 2005-03, Vol.62 (3), p.315-322 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Summary
Objectives Exercise is a potent physiological stimulus of GH secretion. We hypothesized that exogenous recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) administration through an increase in GH and IGF‐I levels would blunt the GH response to exercise. The aim of the study was to examine and compare the impact of rhGH on the exercise‐induced GH response in healthy normal men and women.
Design and Measurements Sixty‐nine subjects (36 men, 33 women) were randomized to receive low‐dose rhGH (0·1 U/kg/day), high dose rhGH (0·2 U/kg/day), or placebo. Subjects were matched for age (24 ± 3·1), and body mass index (BMI). rhGH was given as a single subcutaneous (s.c.) injection for the first 28 days. All subjects exercised to exhaustion (maximal oxygen consumption – VO2max) before rhGH treatment (Test 1), and on day 28 (Test 2). GH was measured before exercise (time 0), immediately after exercise (time 0′) and at 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min postexercise. Baseline IGF‐I levels were measured before exercise on days 0 and 28.
Results Baseline IGF‐I levels showed no gender differences (42·3 women vs. 38·8 nmol/l men) but basal GH values were higher in women (9·9 vs. 1·8 mU/l, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0300-0664 1365-2265 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02216.x |