Progress and challenges in high-resolution refinement of protein structure models

• Published in: Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics structure, function, and bioinformatics, 2005-04, Vol.59 (1), p.15-29
• Main Authors: Misura, Kira M.S., Baker, David
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Computer Simulation; free energy function; Hydrogen Bonding; model refinement; Models, Molecular; Models, Structural; Protein Conformation; protein structure prediction; Proteins - chemistry; Rosetta; Sensitivity and Specificity
• ISSN: 0887-3585; 1097-0134
• DOI: 10.1002/prot.20376

Achieving atomic level accuracy in de novo structure prediction presents a formidable challenge even in the context of protein models with correct topologies. High‐resolution refinement is a fundamental test of force field accuracy and sampling methodology, and its limited success in both comparative modeling and de novo prediction contexts highlights the limitations of current approaches. We constructed four tests to identify bottlenecks in our current approach and to guide progress in this challenging area. The first three tests showed that idealized native structures are stable under our refinement simulation conditions and that the refinement protocol can significantly decrease the root mean square deviation (RMSD) of perturbed native structures. In the fourth test we applied the refinement protocol to de novo models and showed that accurate models could be identified based on their energies, and in several cases many of the buried side chains adopted native‐like conformations. We also showed that the differences in backbone and side‐chain conformations between the refined de novo models and the native structures are largely localized to loop regions and regions where the native structure has unusual features such as rare rotamers or atypical hydrogen bonding between β‐strands. The refined de novo models typically have higher energies than refined idealized native structures, indicating that sampling of local backbone conformations and side‐chain packing arrangements in a condensed state is a primary obstacle. Proteins 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.