Loading…
Nuchal translucency in pregnancies conceived after assisted reproduction technology
Objectives Levels of maternal serum markers of fetal Down syndrome in pregnancies conceived after assisted reproduction are different from those of normal spontaneous pregnancies. The present study examined the effects of conventional in‐vitro fertilization (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (I...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 2005-03, Vol.25 (3), p.234-238 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objectives
Levels of maternal serum markers of fetal Down syndrome in pregnancies conceived after assisted reproduction are different from those of normal spontaneous pregnancies. The present study examined the effects of conventional in‐vitro fertilization (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and embryo cryopreservation on nuchal translucency (NT) thickness.
Methods
A retrospective analysis on 16 673 spontaneous pregnancies, 119 pregnancies with fresh embryos from IVF, 62 pregnancies with frozen‐thawed embryos from IVF, 81 pregnancies with fresh embryos from ICSI and 39 frozen‐thawed embryos from ICSI was performed. All were singletons with known normal outcomes. Multiples of the median (MoM) of NT were compared.
Results
The median NT MoM of spontaneous pregnancies was 1.01. In the assisted reproduction pregnancies, the median NT MoM were significantly increased to 1.07 (P = 0.003), 1.09 (P = 0.009) and 1.09 (P = 0.001) in pregnancies conceived with fresh embryos from IVF, frozen‐thawed embryos from IVF and fresh embryos from ICSI, respectively. A non‐significant increase in median NT MoM (1.04; P = 0.489) was also observed in pregnancies with frozen‐thawed embryos from ICSI.
Conclusions
Increased NT in assisted reproduction pregnancies is postulated to be due to some delay in fetal development. Another possible reason might be related to adverse antenatal course in these pregnancies. Copyright © 2005 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0960-7692 1469-0705 |
DOI: | 10.1002/uog.1846 |