Loading…
Intussusception of bladder neck improves early continence after radical prostatectomy: Results of a prospective trial
To evaluate the impact of intussusception of the bladder neck on post-radical prostatectomy incontinence. A total of 272 men with organ-confined prostate cancer who had undergone radical retropubic prostatectomy were studied. Of the 272 men, 139 underwent bladder neck intussusception and 133 did not...
Saved in:
Published in: | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2005-03, Vol.65 (3), p.524-527 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | To evaluate the impact of intussusception of the bladder neck on post-radical prostatectomy incontinence.
A total of 272 men with organ-confined prostate cancer who had undergone radical retropubic prostatectomy were studied. Of the 272 men, 139 underwent bladder neck intussusception and 133 did not. Patients completed validated questionnaires IIQ-7 and a symptom inventory. Continence was defined as the use of no or only one pad daily.
Of the 272 men, 100%, 98.5%, and 96% answered the questionnaire and urinary symptom inventory at baseline and 3 and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. According to the protective pad requirement, 100%, 60%, and 86% of patients without intussusception and 100%, 77%, and 83% of the patients with intussusception were continent at baseline and 3 and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed a statistically significant impact of intussusception on postprostatectomy incontinence at 3 months (
P = 0.009), although continence at 12 months did not differ significantly (
P = 0.5).
Intussusception of the bladder neck had a significant effect on regaining continence at 3 months, although continence at 12 months was not affected. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0090-4295 1527-9995 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.urology.2004.09.066 |