The relationship between attachment styles and Cluster B personality disorders in prisoners and forensic inpatients

• Published in: International journal of law and psychiatry 2006, Vol.29 (1), p.48-56
• Main Authors: Timmerman, Irma G.H., Emmelkamp, Paul M.G.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Attachment; Behavioural disorders; Cluster analysis; Cluster B; Female; Forensic inpatients; Forensic Psychiatry; Forensic science; Human relations; Humans; Interpersonal Relations; Law; Male; Middle Aged; Object Attachment; Pathology; Personality; Personality disorder; Personality Disorders - epidemiology; Personality Disorders - psychology; Prisoners; Prisoners - psychology; Prisoners - statistics & numerical data; Psychiatry; Surveys and Questionnaires
• ISSN: 0160-2527; 1873-6386
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2005.04.005

The relationship between attachment styles and Cluster B personality disorders were examined among prisoners, forensic inpatients and controls from the general population. Forensic inpatients and prisoners reported significantly less frequently the secure attachment style (Relationship Questionnaire) and significantly more the fearful attachment style compared to the normal controls. Both forensic groups could not be distinguished from each other. Further, prisoners, forensic inpatients and controls could not be differentiated on the basis of the dismissing nor the preoccupied attachment style. With respect to personality pathology, almost all relationships between Cluster C pathology, on the one hand, and attachment styles, on the other, were significant. Cluster A pathology was clearly related to the secure and fearful attachment style. With respect to cluster B pathology, the results were more specific but also less clear. The results were strongly dependent on the way the personality pathology variables were treated, as either categorical or dimensional. None of the cluster B personality pathology variables were associated with the fearful attachment style and histrionic personality pathology was negatively associated with the dismissing attachment style. Antisocial personality features were associated with a dismissing attachment style. Borderline personality pathology, when treated as a categorical variable, was significantly related to the preoccupied attachment style. These results show that (1) cluster A and cluster C pathology are more strongly associated with attachment than cluster B, (2) treating personality data as either dimensional or categorical is of major importance to the conclusions that can be drawn, (3) it is important to control for the influence of co-morbid personality pathology when examining the relationship between (Cluster B) personality pathology and attachment.