Loading…
Serial reversal learning of position discrimination in developing rats
The current study established a procedure to evaluate the capability of rats on postnatal days (PND) 21, 26, and 30 to perform a spatial serial reversal task using a T‐maze. Training consisted of an acquisition session followed by a series of six reversal sessions. To examine the role of proactive i...
Saved in:
Published in: | Developmental psychobiology 2006-01, Vol.48 (1), p.79-94 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The current study established a procedure to evaluate the capability of rats on postnatal days (PND) 21, 26, and 30 to perform a spatial serial reversal task using a T‐maze. Training consisted of an acquisition session followed by a series of six reversal sessions. To examine the role of proactive interference in the serial reversal effect, the point of reversal was manipulated so that it occurred at the start of each session (between‐sessions) or the midpoint of each session (within‐sessions). Performance was initially impaired during the first reversal but improved dramatically across the series. Reversal between‐sessions enhanced this serial reversal effect in comparison to reversal within‐sessions. Experiment 1 showed that rats of all ages learned the between‐sessions serial reversal task at a comparable rate. However, on the within‐sessions task, PND21 rats were impaired relative to the PND26 and 30 rats, which did not differ. Experiment 2 revealed that the addition of a tactile cue that is correlated with each phase of reversal eliminated age and task differences in serial reversal performance. These findings suggest that higher‐order cognitive processes underlying serial reversal are present during the weanling period, but there is some improvement with age under conditions involving high memory interference and/or difficulty in detecting the transition between reversal phases. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Psychobiol 48: 79–94, 2006. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0012-1630 1098-2302 |
DOI: | 10.1002/dev.20106 |