When can we distinguish between neutral and non-neutral processes in community dynamics under ecological drift?

• Published in: Ecology letters 2009-09, Vol.12 (9), p.909-919
• Main Authors: Ruokolainen, Lasse, Ranta, Esa, Kaitala, Veijo, Fowler, Mike S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal and plant ecology; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Animals; Biodiversity; Biological and medical sciences; Bray & Curtis; community composition; Community ecology; dispersal; ecological similarity; Ecosystem; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; General aspects; metacommunity; Models, Biological; neutral model; percent similarity; Population genetics
• ISSN: 1461-023X; 1461-0248
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01346.x

Determining whether the composition of ecological communities (species presence and abundance), can be predicted from species demographic traits, rather than being a result of neutral drift, is a key ecological question. Here we compare the similarity of community composition, from different community assembly models run under identical environmental conditions, where interspecific competition is assumed to be either neutral or niche‐based. In both cases, species colonize a focal patch from a network of neighbouring patches in a metacommunity. We highlight the circumstances (rate and spatial scale of dispersal, and the relative importance of ecological drift) where commonly used community similarity metrics or species rank–abundance relationships are likely to give similar results, regardless of the underlying processes (neutral or non‐neural) driving species’ dynamics. As drift becomes more important in driving species abundances, deterministic niche structure has a smaller influence. Our ability to discriminate between different underlying processes driving community organization depends on the relative importance of different drift processes that operate on different spatial scales.