Cooperation or Co-Optation?: Assessing the Methodological Benefits and Barriers Involved in Conducting Qualitative Research Through Medical Institutional Settings

In this article, the authors highlight some benefits of and barriers to doing qualitative research in association with hospital-based services. They first describe an ongoing qualitative research project that involves interviewing women about their post-sexual assault medicolegal experiences in hosp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Qualitative health research 2005-05, Vol.15 (5), p.686-697
Main Authors: Parnis, Deborah, Du Mont, Janice, Gombay, Brydon
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bioethics
Canada
Ethics Committees, Research - organization & administration
Female
Feminism
Forensic Medicine - standards
Health technology assessment
Hospital-Patient Relations
Hospitals
Hospitals, Community - ethics
Hospitals, Community - organization & administration
Hospitals, Community - standards
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Paternalism
Program Evaluation
Project evaluation
Qualitative Research
Rape
Rape - psychology
Research Design
Research methodology
Researcher-Subject Relations - ethics
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this article, the authors highlight some benefits of and barriers to doing qualitative research in association with hospital-based services. They first describe an ongoing qualitative research project that involves interviewing women about their post-sexual assault medicolegal experiences in hospital-situated sexual assault centers across a large Canadian province. Their methodological journey led them to engage program coordinators at these centers to assist with locating participants and qualified interviewers, and with negotiating the demands of their respective research ethics boards. They outline the ways in which their project was shaped, positively and negatively, by working with them in medical institutions. They conclude by recommending that hospitals and hospital ethics boards counteract tendencies toward paternalism by recognizing the value of feminist qualitative research contributions to the activities of their own sexual assault centers and to the recovery of sexually assaulted women. Such recognition might be productively engaged by adopting an ethics-in-process approach.
ISSN:1049-7323
1552-7557
DOI:10.1177/1049732304271832