External fixation and infection of soft tissues close to fracture localization

We evaluated the method of external fixation for stabilization of unstable closed and open first-degree diaphyseal fractures of long bones of lower extremities in 19 patients with infections of soft tissues close to the fracture location. The results are compared with those of another group (n = 392...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Military medicine 2006-01, Vol.171 (1), p.88-91
Main Authors: Has, Borislav, Nagy, Aleksandar, Pavić, Roman, Splavski, Bruno, Kristek, Jozo, Vidović, Drazen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Croatia
External Fixators
Fracture Fixation
Humans
Lower Extremity - injuries
Osteitis
Soft Tissue Infections - diagnosis
Soft Tissue Infections - pathology
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We evaluated the method of external fixation for stabilization of unstable closed and open first-degree diaphyseal fractures of long bones of lower extremities in 19 patients with infections of soft tissues close to the fracture location. The results are compared with those of another group (n = 392) of patients, with similar fractures without infections close to the fracture site, treated with inner stabilization methods. In the first group of patients, we noticed postoperative osteitis of the tibia in two cases (10%), but no pseudarthrosis or lesions of important blood vessels. In the second group of patients, the incidence of postoperative osteitis was 8.6% (n = 34) and the incidence of pseudarthrosis was 2% (n = 8). Among these patients, three lesions of important blood vessels were diagnosed. Our conclusion is that when the method of external fixation is used in combination with skillful operative techniques, the infection of soft tissues near the fracture location has no principal influence on the frequency of osteitis.
ISSN:0026-4075
1930-613X
DOI:10.7205/MILMED.171.1.88