Loading…

Nasal exposure to Staphylococcal enterotoxin enhances the development of allergic rhinitis in mice

Summary Background Staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs) appear to play a role in the pathogenesis of allergic disease. However, little is known whether the nasal exposure to SE affects the development of allergic rhinitis (AR). Objective We sought to determine the in vivo effect of nasal exposure to SE...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical and experimental allergy 2005-04, Vol.35 (4), p.506-514
Main Authors: Okano, M., Hattori, H., Yoshino, T., Sugata, Y., Yamamoto, M., Fujiwara, T., Satoskar, A. A., Satoskar, A. R., Nishizaki, K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Background Staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs) appear to play a role in the pathogenesis of allergic disease. However, little is known whether the nasal exposure to SE affects the development of allergic rhinitis (AR). Objective We sought to determine the in vivo effect of nasal exposure to SE on the development of AR using mouse model. Methods BALB/c mice were intranasally sensitized with Schistosoma mansoni egg antigen (SmEA) in the presence or absence of staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB). Control mice were intranasally sensitized with either SEB or SmEA alone. The production of antigen‐specific antibodies including IgE, nasal eosinoplilia and cytokines by nasal mononuclear cells was compared among mice that had or had not received SEB treatment. Results Nasal exposure to SEB enhanced the development of AR in SmEA‐sensitized mice, as manifested by SmEA‐specific IgE production, nasal eosinophilia, and IL‐4 and IL‐5 production by nasal mononuclear cells after Ag challenge. This treatment also elicited IFN‐γ production by SmEA‐primed cells. In addition, these mice produced SEB‐specific IgE whereas mice treated with SEB without SmEA sensitization did not produce SEB‐specific IgE or demonstrate nasal eosinophilia. Conclusion These results suggest that the nasal exposure to SEB enhances susceptibility to AR although the exposure to SE solely does not induce AR.
ISSN:0954-7894
1365-2222
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02195.x