Loading…

Contact mechanics and tip shape in AFM-based nanomechanical measurements

Stiffness–load curves obtained in quantitative atomic force acoustic microscopy (AFAM) measurements depend on both the elastic properties of the sample and the geometry of the atomic force microscope (AFM) tip. The geometry of silicon AFM tips changes when used in contact mode, affecting measurement...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ultramicroscopy 2006-04, Vol.106 (6), p.466-474
Main Authors: Kopycinska-Müller, Malgorzata, Geiss, Roy H., Hurley, Donna C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Stiffness–load curves obtained in quantitative atomic force acoustic microscopy (AFAM) measurements depend on both the elastic properties of the sample and the geometry of the atomic force microscope (AFM) tip. The geometry of silicon AFM tips changes when used in contact mode, affecting measurement accuracy. To study the influence of tip geometry, we subjected ten AFM tips to the same series of AFAM measurements. Changes in tip shape were observed in the scanning electron microscope (SEM) between individual AFAM tests. Because all of the AFAM measurements were performed on the same sample, variations in AFAM stiffness–load curves were attributed to differences in tip geometry. Contact-mechanics models that assumed simple tip geometries were used to analyze the AFAM data, but the calculated values for tip dimensions did not agree with those provided by SEM images. Therefore, we used a power-law approach that allows for a nonspherical tip geometry. We found that after several AFAM measurements, the geometry of the tips at the very end is intermediate between those of a flat punch and a hemisphere. These results indicate that the nanoscale tip-sample contact cannot easily be described in terms of simple, ideal geometries.
ISSN:0304-3991
1879-2723
DOI:10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.12.006