Presidential address: Medical-legal issues in obstetrics and gynecology

Patients, physicians, insurance companies, and legislators are expressing mounting concern in the area of malpractice insurance costs and its effect on the availability of health care. In 1986, the highest award in the history of medical-legal claims, $1,200,000, was paid. By 2001, the average award...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2005-06, Vol.192 (6), p.1883-1889
Main Author: Laros, Russell K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
California
Expert witness
Female
Gynecology - economics
Gynecology - legislation & jurisprudence
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Insurance, Liability - economics
Insurance, Liability - legislation & jurisprudence
Legislation, Medical
Malpractice
Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act
Obstetrics - economics
Obstetrics - legislation & jurisprudence
Pregnancy
Tort reform
United States
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Patients, physicians, insurance companies, and legislators are expressing mounting concern in the area of malpractice insurance costs and its effect on the availability of health care. In 1986, the highest award in the history of medical-legal claims, $1,200,000, was paid. By 2001, the average award had increased to $3,500,000. In the late 1970s the California's Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA) was passed. This article discusses the elements of this important legislation and its effects on the cost of medical malpractice in California, the anatomy and pathophysiology of a medical-legal claim, and the characteristics of excellent expert witnesses and suggests some important elements of a redesigned system of medical-jurisprudence.
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.058