Loading…
Biologically enhanced sampling geometric docking and backbone flexibility treatment with multiconformational superposition
An efficient biologically enhanced sampling geometric docking method is presented based on the FTDock algorithm to predict the protein–protein binding modes. The active site data from different sources, such as biochemical and biophysical experiments or theoretical analyses of sequence data, can be...
Saved in:
Published in: | Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics structure, function, and bioinformatics, 2005-08, Vol.60 (2), p.319-323 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | An efficient biologically enhanced sampling geometric docking method is presented based on the FTDock algorithm to predict the protein–protein binding modes. The active site data from different sources, such as biochemical and biophysical experiments or theoretical analyses of sequence data, can be incorporated in the rotation–translation scan. When discretizing a protein onto a 3‐dimensional (3D) grid, a zero value is given to grid points outside a sphere centered on the geometric center of specified residues. In this way, docking solutions are biased toward modes where the interface region is inside the sphere. We also adopt a multiconformational superposition scheme to represent backbone flexibility in the proteins. When these procedures were applied to the targets of CAPRI, a larger number of hits and smaller ligand root‐mean‐square deviations (RMSDs) were obtained at the conformational search stage in all cases, and especially Target 19. With Target 18, only 1 near‐native structure was retained by the biologically enhanced sampling geometric docking method, but this number increased to 53 and the least ligand RMSD decreased from 8.1 Å to 2.9 Å after performing multiconformational superposition. These results were obtained after the CAPRI prediction deadlines. Proteins 2005;60:319–323. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0887-3585 1097-0134 |
DOI: | 10.1002/prot.20577 |