Loading…
The Diet Quality Index-Revised: A Tool to Promote and Evaluate Dietary Change among Older Cancer Survivors Enrolled in a Home-Based Intervention Trial
Abstract Objective To utilize the Diet Quality Index-Revised (DQI-R) as a framework for delivering and evaluating an intervention to improve overall diet quality among older cancer survivors. Design As part of a randomized controlled trial to improve lifestyle behaviors among older cancer survivors,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2007-09, Vol.107 (9), p.1519-1529 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract Objective To utilize the Diet Quality Index-Revised (DQI-R) as a framework for delivering and evaluating an intervention to improve overall diet quality among older cancer survivors. Design As part of a randomized controlled trial to improve lifestyle behaviors among older cancer survivors, we sought a dietary measure that could serve as both an intervention framework and a means to evaluate global dietary quality. The DQI-R measures overall diet quality by summing 10 subscales that relate to national guidelines. At baseline, DQI-R scores were generated from three multi-pass 24-hour dietary recalls. The 6-month intervention delivered tailored feedback on individual DQI-R subscales. Dietary recalls were repeated at 6 and 12 months. Subjects Elderly (aged ≥65 years) individuals within 18 months of diagnosis of breast or prostate cancer (n=182) were randomized postbaseline measures to intervention vs attention control arms. Results Significant differences in overall diet quality were observed between arms at 6 months, with the intervention arm improving (67.6±12.2 to 69.8±13.9), and controls declining (67.5±12.5 to 64.6±14.7) ( P =0.003). Significant differences were observed between arms over time in dietary diversity subscale scores: baseline and 6-month follow-up means among intervention and control arms were 4.8±1.3 to 4.8±1.4, and 4.7±1.2 to 4.1±1.1, respectively ( P =0.001). Conclusions The DQI-R served as an effective guide and evaluation tool for this diet-related randomized controlled trial. Like many interventions, our effect diminished after the intervention was complete. Future research should consider testing interventions that use the DQI-R, or other global diet-related indexes, as guides and evaluation tools over longer study periods, as well as in other populations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-8223 2212-2672 1878-3570 2212-2680 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jada.2007.06.014 |