Loading…

Abciximab offers greater benefits to insulin-dependent diabetic patients undergoing coronary stent implantation

Abstract Introduction and objectives Abciximab use does not exceed 25% in most of the studies on diabetic patients undergoing stent implantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether abciximab could be more beneficial in different subgroups such as insulin-dependent (ID) patients and whethe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cardiovascular revascularization medicine 2007-07, Vol.8 (3), p.175-182
Main Authors: López-Mínguez, José R, Nogales, Juan M, González, Reyes, Palanco, Carlos, Doncel, Javier, Vaello, Alejandra, Giménez, Fernando, Morales, Angel, Alonso, Rafael, Merchán, Antonio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Introduction and objectives Abciximab use does not exceed 25% in most of the studies on diabetic patients undergoing stent implantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether abciximab could be more beneficial in different subgroups such as insulin-dependent (ID) patients and whether its use could provide additional benefits to those afforded by drug-eluting stents in these patients. Patients and methods A total of 373 consecutive diabetics [223 non-insulin-dependent (NID) and 150 ID patients] who had undergone stent implantation were examined with a follow-up of 25.6±16.2 months. Abciximab was used in 21.7%. Results The abciximab-treated group had a lower rate of revascularization (26.8% vs. 15.8%. P =.02). The results by subgroups were as follows: NID nonabciximab, 23.5%; NID abciximab, 19% ( P =NS); ID nonabciximab, 32.7%; ID abciximab, 12.2% ( P =.05). In multivariate analysis, the restenosis predictors were insulin dependency (OR, 2.7), abciximab use (OR, 0.18), stent diameter (OR, 0.18). Conclusions Abciximab use in diabetics with stent implantation has a favorable effect by reducing the need for new revascularization. This benefit is more evident in ID patients; the negative prognosis effect of being insulin-dependent is eliminated, and the percentage of events in this population over a long follow-up period is equal to those in NID patients.
ISSN:1553-8389
1878-0938
DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2007.03.005