Growth and health status of street children in Dhaka, Bangladesh

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of street life on the growth and health status of poor children who live and work full‐time on the streets of Dhaka, Bangladesh (street children), independent of the effects of poverty. This was accomplished by comparing 142 street children with 150...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of human biology 2007-01, Vol.19 (1), p.51-60
Main Authors: Greksa, Lawrence P., Rie, Naganuma, Islam, A.B.M. Rafiqul, Maki, Uchida, Omori, Kinuko
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescent
Adolescent Development
Bangladesh
Body Size
Child
Child Development
Female
Health Status
Homeless Youth
Humans
Male
Poverty Areas
Retrospective Studies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of street life on the growth and health status of poor children who live and work full‐time on the streets of Dhaka, Bangladesh (street children), independent of the effects of poverty. This was accomplished by comparing 142 street children with 150 poor children who live and work on the streets of Dhaka but who return to their families at night (slum children). Children between 7–14 years old were recruited at locales where street and slum children are typically found. Weight and upper arm circumference did not differ significantly between street and slum children (P > 0.05), but energy reserves, as assessed by skinfolds, were significantly larger in street than in slum children (P < 0.05). There was no wasting in either street or slum children. Although the majority of children in both groups were stunted and underweight, there were no significant differences between groups (P > 0.05). The prevalence of disease symptoms tended to be slightly higher in street children than in slum children, but few of the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). These data do not support the contention that street children are a particularly high‐risk group. The greater‐than‐expected growth and health status of street children, compared to other poor children, may be due to biologically fitter children being more likely to permanently move to the streets and/or to remain on the streets once the move has been made. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 19:51–60, 2007. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:1042-0533
1520-6300
DOI:10.1002/ajhb.20573