Loading…
Fire effects on stable isotopes in a Sierran forested watershed
This study tested the hypothesis that stable C and N isotope values in surface soil and litter would be increased by fire due to volatilization of lighter isotopes. The hypothesis was tested by: (1) performing experimental laboratory burns of organic and mineral soil materials from a watershed at co...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of environmental quality 2007-01, Vol.36 (1), p.91-100 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This study tested the hypothesis that stable C and N isotope values in surface soil and litter would be increased by fire due to volatilization of lighter isotopes. The hypothesis was tested by: (1) performing experimental laboratory burns of organic and mineral soil materials from a watershed at combinations of temperature ranging 100 to 600°C and duration ranging from 1 to 60 min; (2) testing field samples of upland soils before, shortly after, and 1 yr following a wildfire in the same watershed; and (3) testing field soil samples from a down-gradient ash/sediment depositional area in a riparian zone following a runoff event after the wildfire. Muffle furnace results indicated the most effective temperature range for using stable isotopes for tracing fire impacts is 200 to 400°C because lower burn temperatures may not produce strong isotopic shifts, and at temperatures > or = 600°C, N and C content of residual material is too low. Analyses of field soil samples were inconclusive: there was a slightly significant effect of the wildfire on delta ¹⁵N values in upland watershed analyses 1 yr postburn, while riparian zone analyses results indicated that delta ¹³C values significantly decreased approximately 0.71% over a 9 mo post-fire period (p = 0.015), and ash/sediment layer delta ¹³C values were approximately 0.65% higher than those in the A horizon. The lack of field confirmation may have been due to overall wildfire burn temperatures being |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0047-2425 1537-2537 |
DOI: | 10.2134/jeq2006.0233 |