Loading…

Protein isolated from biopharmaceutical formulations cannot be used for comparative studies: Follow‐up to “a case study using Epoetin Alfa from Epogen and EPREX”

In the biotechnology area, the issue of comparability with an innovator product is complex. Ideally, a side‐by‐side comparison of physical properties would be part of the demonstration of comparability. However, biogeneric companies do not have access to the bulk drug substance from the innovator co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of pharmaceutical sciences 2007-12, Vol.96 (12), p.3214-3225
Main Authors: Heavner, G.A., Arakawa, T., Philo, J.S., Calmann, M.A., LaBrenz, S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In the biotechnology area, the issue of comparability with an innovator product is complex. Ideally, a side‐by‐side comparison of physical properties would be part of the demonstration of comparability. However, biogeneric companies do not have access to the bulk drug substance from the innovator company for biophysical comparison, and isolation of protein from marketed product cannot be guaranteed to produce material that is identical to the bulk drug substance from which it was prepared. In a recently published study, protein was isolated from marketed product and comparative studies performed. In a follow‐up investigation of the published work, we demonstrate here that even a simple isolation procedure can significantly compromise the protein, which raises serious questions about the interpretation of that study, and in a broader context the value of any studies done with such “out‐of‐process” protein. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 96: 3214–3225, 2007
ISSN:0022-3549
1520-6017
DOI:10.1002/jps.20993