Survey from skills-based hands on learning courses demonstrates increased laparoscopic caseload and clinical laparoscopic suturing

• Published in: Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2005-08, Vol.66 (2), p.271-273
• Main Authors: Pareek, Gyan, Hedican, Sean P., Bishoff, Jay T., Shichman, Steven J., Wolf, J. Stuart, Nakada, Stephen Y.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Biological and medical sciences; Clinical Competence; Humans; Laparoscopy - statistics & numerical data; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases; Surveys and Questionnaires; Suture Techniques - statistics & numerical data; Urology - education
• ISSN: 0090-4295; 1527-9995
• DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.03.023

To evaluate the impact of the American Urological Association Hands on Laparoscopy course on the participants’ practices. Many urologists without fellowship training perform laparoscopy, but do not advance beyond hand-assisted, extirpative laparoscopy. The American Urological Association Hands on Laparoscopy course was designed to help these practitioners advance their skills. A total of 68 urologists, aged 31 to 61 years (mean 46.6), participated in one of the four courses given between August 2002 and March 2004. The 2-day course included performing standardized tasks under videotape analysis and participating in porcine and pelvic trainer laboratory sessions. Surveys were sent by regular and electronic mail in September 2004 to assess the courses’ impact. The mean follow-up was 15.2 months (range 7 to 25). Of the 68 surveys mailed, 54 were returned (79%). Most respondents were in private practice and had had prior experience with extirpative laparoscopy. Of the respondents, 41 (76%) reported that their laparoscopic practice had expanded after taking the course, with 34% performing at least 2 cases per month. Also, 33 respondents (61%) reported performing laparoscopic suturing after taking the course, with 35% having sutured a bleeding vessel. Of the respondents, 85% reported that the video mentoring during the course was helpful. Of those who purchased a pelvic trainer, 90% reported practicing on it regularly. The Hands on Laparoscopy course appeared to contribute to expansion of laparoscopic practices. Experience gained from skills-based lectures, videotape analysis of pelvic trainer performance, and a mentored porcine laboratory resulted in most (61%) participants expanding their practice to include clinical laparoscopic suturing.