Loading…

Static thermography revisited—An adjunct method for determining the depth of the burn injury

The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between the static thermography figure of merit Δ T (the difference in mean values of skin area temperature for the burn wound area and the unaffected reference skin area) and a means of burn classification which would be most suitable for the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Burns 2005-09, Vol.31 (6), p.768-775
Main Authors: Renkielska, Alicja, Nowakowski, Antoni, Kaczmarek, Mariusz, Dobke, Marek K., Grudziński, Jacek, Karmolinski, Andrzej, Stojek, Wojciech
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between the static thermography figure of merit Δ T (the difference in mean values of skin area temperature for the burn wound area and the unaffected reference skin area) and a means of burn classification which would be most suitable for the choice of treatment. The work was an in vivo animal experiment. Statistical analysis showed a high correlation between the Δ T parameter and histopathological assessment. With regard to the choice of treatment, the most useful correlation was found to be that between Δ T and the classification of burn wounds into those healed in 3 weeks and those unhealed. The results of this study have revealed a quantitative criterion Δ T for burn classification. The study suggests that particular burn centres using static thermography use a Δ T parameter based on their own values for burn classification so as to group burn wounds into those that healed in 3 weeks and those that did not heal. This criterion should be independent of and replace other classification systems. A criterion for the proper choice of burn treatment would then be made more readily available.
ISSN:0305-4179
1879-1409
DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2005.04.006