Loading…

Role of androgen receptor in the progression of human prostate tumor cells to androgen independence and insensitivity

BACKGROUND Various studies have implicated the androgen receptor (AR) in the progression of androgen‐dependent human prostate cancer cells to androgen‐independent and androgen‐insensitive phenotypes, but the exact role of AR in progression is unclear. METHODS To mimic the clinical situation and test...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Prostate 2005-12, Vol.65 (4), p.287-298
Main Authors: Kokontis, John M., Hsu, Stephen, Chuu, Chih-pin, Dang, Mai, Fukuchi, Junichi, Hiipakka, Richard A., Liao, Shutsung
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BACKGROUND Various studies have implicated the androgen receptor (AR) in the progression of androgen‐dependent human prostate cancer cells to androgen‐independent and androgen‐insensitive phenotypes, but the exact role of AR in progression is unclear. METHODS To mimic the clinical situation and test the role of AR in progression, we cultured androgen‐dependent LNCaP 104‐S prostate tumor cells in the presence of the antiandrogen Casodex (bicalutamide) to derive resistant (CDXR) clones. In a second step, we cultured CDXR cells in the presence of the androgen R1881, which generated androgen‐ and Casodex‐insensitive (IS) cells. These cells were then characterized with regard to AR function and the effect of ectopic AR expression or AR knockdown on androgen sensitivity. RESULTS CDXR cells showed increased AR expression and transcriptional activity. CDXR cell proliferation was unaffected by Casodex but was repressed by androgen in vitro and in vivo. IS cells, on the other hand, had greatly reduced AR expression and activity compared to CDXR cells. Knockdown of AR expression in CDXR cells produced cells that were insensitive to androgen. Conversely, re‐expression of AR in IS cells regenerated cells that were repressed by androgen. Knockdown of AR expression in 104‐S cells produced cells that remained stimulated by androgen, while overexpression of AR in 104‐S cells generated an androgen‐repressed phenotype but did not confer androgen‐independent growth. CONCLUSIONS Increased AR expression determines whether prostate cancer cells are repressed by androgen, but is not required for androgen independence. These results may have implications for anti‐AR therapy for prostate cancer. Prostate. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:0270-4137
1097-0045
DOI:10.1002/pros.20285