Loading…
Preliminary results with early corticosteroid withdrawal in African American renal allograft recipients
There is a paucity of data regarding the use of steroid-avoidance immunosuppression (SAI) in African American (AA) renal allograft recipients, traditionally considered a high-risk subgroup of patients with higher reported rates of acute rejection and graft loss. We compared the outcomes of 27 AA ren...
Saved in:
Published in: | Surgery 2005-10, Vol.138 (4), p.772-779 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | There is a paucity of data regarding the use of steroid-avoidance immunosuppression (SAI) in African American (AA) renal allograft recipients, traditionally considered a high-risk subgroup of patients with higher reported rates of acute rejection and graft loss.
We compared the outcomes of 27 AA renal allograft recipients receiving SAI (SA group; mean follow-up period, 12 ± 3 mo) with those of 20 patients receiving a steroid taper (ST group; 24 ± 11 mo). In both groups, thymoglobulin was used for induction, and mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus were used for maintenance. Four doses of methylprednisolone were given on days 0 to 3. In the SA group no further steroids were given, whereas in the ST group a prednisone taper was continued thereafter.
ST patients were more likely to have current panel reactive antibody titers greater than 10%, undergo retransplantation, and receive more doses of thymoglobulin. There were no significant differences between the SA and ST groups with regard to patient survival (96% vs 95%), graft survival (96% vs 90%), acute rejection (11% vs 14%), cytomegalovirus infection (7% vs 10%), posttransplant diabetes mellitus (11% vs 24%), or mean serum creatinine concentration at 6 months (1.6 vs 1.5 mg/dL), respectively, with a trend toward less percent weight gain in SA patients at 6 months (5% vs 11%, P = .06).
SAI can produce excellent short-term results in AA kidney transplant patients when compared with a conventional ST protocol. Our results will need to be verified in larger numbers of patients with longer follow-up evaluation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0039-6060 1532-7361 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.surg.2005.06.055 |