Loading…

Radionuclide imaging for the assessment of esophageal motility disorders in mixed connective tissue disease patients: relation to pulmonary impairment

Esophageal functional abnormalities may lead to regurgitation, chronic esophagitis and life‐threatening conditions such as aspiration pneumonia. In mixed connective tissue disease patients, previous reports showed that esophageal dysfunction varies according to the method employed for investigation....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diseases of the esophagus 2006-10, Vol.19 (5), p.394-400
Main Authors: Caleiro, M. T. C., Lage, L. V., Navarro-Rodriguez, T., Bresser, A., Da Costa, P. A., Yoshinari, N. H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Esophageal functional abnormalities may lead to regurgitation, chronic esophagitis and life‐threatening conditions such as aspiration pneumonia. In mixed connective tissue disease patients, previous reports showed that esophageal dysfunction varies according to the method employed for investigation. Our study was conceived to: (i) assess esophageal motility and mucosal aspects in patients with mixed connective tissue disease by endoscopy, cine‐esophogram and scintigraphy focusing on the prevalence of each exam; and (ii) verify the association between pulmonary and esophageal dysfunctions. Twenty‐four mixed connective tissue disease patients were enrolled for this study. Cine‐esophogram and upper digestive endoscopy with mucosal biopsy were performed according to previous standardization. Radionuclide esophageal scintigraphy was performed with a semisolid meal with 99mTc. Eleven healthy individuals voluntarily submitted to scintigraphy as controls. Cine‐esophogram showed esophageal delayed emptying in 90% of patients. At scintigraphy there was a significant delay in total esophageal transit time in the group of patients when compared to healthy controls (35.3 ± 8.2 s. vs. 13.6 ± 9.5 s.; P 
ISSN:1120-8694
1442-2050
DOI:10.1111/j.1442-2050.2006.00598.x