Importance of Anterograde Visualization of the Coronary Venous Network by Selective Left Coronary Angiography Prior To Resynchronization

• Published in: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2007-01, Vol.30 (1), p.70-76
• Main Authors: DELARCHE, NICOLAS, BADER, HUGUES, LASSERRE, RAPHAEL, DERVAL, NICOLAS, DEBEUGNY, STEPHAN, DENARD, MAIALIZ, ESTRADE, GÉRARD
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; angiography; congestive heart failure; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Vessels - anatomy & histology; Female; Humans; Male; Pacemaker, Artificial; pacing
• ISSN: 0147-8389; 1540-8159
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00581.x

Background: Understanding of coronary anatomy is essential to the advancement of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) techniques. We determined whether the difficulties associated with catheterization of the coronary sinus (CS) and its lateral branches could be overcome by a preliminary angiographical study of the coronary venous system carried out during a pre‐operative coronary angiography with examination of venous return. Methods and Results: All patients were scheduled for an exploratory angiography procedure and indicated for CRT. Group A patients were implanted with a CRT device after a right arterial angiographical procedure while group B patients had a selective left angiogram including examination of venous return. Data analyzed in group B were: position of CS ostium, number and distribution of lateral branches, and ability to preselect a marginal vein suitable for catheterization. Subsequent device implantation was guided by these parameters. A total of 96 and 89 patients were included in groups A and B, respectively. Implantation success rates were not different (98% and 100%, respectively), but CS catheterization time was reduced in group B (6 minutes vs 4 minutes; P < 10−6) as well as total time required to position the left ventricular lead (25 minutes vs 15 minutes; P < 10−6), fluoroscopy exposure (7 minutes vs 5 minutes; P < 10−6), and volume of contrast medium required (45 mL vs 15 mL; P < 10−6). Conclusion: A coronary angiographical study, including examination of the coronary venous return prior to implantation of a CRT device, can simplify the device implant and allows patient‐specific preselection of appropriate tools for the procedure.