analysis of lipids via HPLC with a charged aerosol detector

• Published in: Lipids 2006-07, Vol.41 (7), p.727-734
• Main Author: Moreau, Robert A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aerosols; Aerosols - chemistry; analytical methods; charged aerosol detector; chemical analysis; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - instrumentation; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - standards; Esters; high performance liquid chromatography; Injection; Ionization; Ions; Light scattering; Lipids; Lipids - analysis; Liquid chromatography; Noise levels; quantitative analysis; reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography; Solvents; Solvents - chemistry
• ISSN: 0024-4201; 1558-9307
• DOI: 10.1007/s11745-006-5024-7

Because most lipid extracts are a mixture of saturated and unsaturated molecules, the most successful strategies for the quantitative analysis of lipids have involved the use of so-called “mass” or universal detectors such as flame ionization detectors and evaporative light scattering detectors. Recently a new type of HPLC “mass” detector, a charge aerosol detector (CAD), was developed and is now commercially available. This detection method involves nebulizing the HPLC column effluent, evaporating the solvents charging the aerosol particles, and measuring the current from the charged aerosol flux. In the present study, the CAD was evaluated with several normal phase and reverse phase HPLC methods commonly used for the quantitative analysis of lipid classes and lipid molecular species. The CAD detected common lipids such as triacylglycerols, diacylglycerols, glycolipids, phospholipids, and sterols. Lower molecular weight lipids such as free FA had smaller peak areas (50-80% lower). FAME were not detected by the CAD, probably because they were completely evaporated and did not form aerosol particles. The minimum limits of detection of the CAD with lipids varied with different mobile phase solvents. Using solvent systems that were predominantly hexane, the minimum limits of detection of triacylglycerols, cholesterol esters, and free sterols were about 1 ng per injection and the mass-to-peak area ratio was nearly linear from the range of about 1 ng to about 20 mg per injection. Three other solvents commonly used for HPLC lipid analysis (methanol, isopropanol, and acetonitrile) caused higher levels of background noise and higher minimum limits of detection. These experiments indicate that the CAD has the potential to become a valuable tool for the quantitative HPLC analysis of lipids. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate full instrument performance.