Ethics of prevention: An interactive computer-tailored program

• Published in: Scandinavian journal of public health 2007-01, Vol.35 (5), p.503-509
• Main Authors: VAN HOOREN, ROB H., VAN DEN BORNE, BART W., CURFS, LEOPOLD M. G., WIDDERSHOVEN, GUY A. M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Attitude to Health; Biological and medical sciences; Caregivers - education; Caregivers - ethics; Caregivers - psychology; Carers; Computer assisted counselling; Ethics; Health Behavior; Health behaviour; Health Promotion - ethics; Humans; Interactive computer assisted learning; Medical sciences; Miscellaneous; Obesity; Obesity - prevention & control; Obesity - psychology; ORIGINAL ARTICLES; Parents - education; Parents - psychology; Patient Education as Topic - ethics; Patient Education as Topic - methods; Patient Participation; Personal Autonomy; Prader-Willi syndrome; Prader-Willi Syndrome - psychology; Professional Autonomy; Public health. Hygiene; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine; Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation; User-Computer Interface
• ISSN: 1403-4948; 1651-1905
• DOI: 10.1080/14034940701271890

Aim: This article describes the contents of an interactive computer-tailored program. The program is based on previous studies of the practice of care for persons with Prader-Willi syndrome. This genetic condition is associated with a constant overeating behaviour with the risk of obesity. The aim of the program is to start a process of awareness, reflection and discussion by caregivers who are confronted with the moral dilemma of respect for autonomy versus restricting overeating behaviour. The program focuses on values (such as health and well-being) that are relevant to caregivers in daily practice. Furthermore, the focus is on various ways of interaction with the client. Caregivers were expected to focus mainly on health, and on both paternalistic and interpretive/deliberative forms of interaction. Methods: Sixteen professionals and 12 parents pilot-tested the program contents. With a pre-test, responses on one central case were collected for tailored feedback; with a post-test, the effects of the program were measured. Results: Significant correlations were found between the values of autonomy and consultation and between autonomy and well-being. In contrast to our expectations respondents valued all categories (autonomy, consultation, health, well-being, and liveability for others) as equally important in the pre-test. No significant changes in scores were found between pre- and post-test. The open answers and remarks of participants support the program contents. Conclusions: Participants' responses support previous research findings, advocating a concept of autonomy in terms of positive freedom, through support by others. The promotion of the client's self-understanding and self-development is central in this concept.