Loading…

Telemetric Recording of Intrapleural Pressure

Background Monitoring of intrapleural pressure (IPP) is used for evaluation of lung function in a number of pathophysiological conditions. We describe a telemetric method of non-invasive monitoring of the IPP in conscious animals intermittently or continuously for a prolonged period of time. Materia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of surgical research 2007-03, Vol.138 (1), p.10-14
Main Authors: Ednick, Mathew D., M.D, Pagala, Murali, Barakat, John-Pierre, Nino, Gustavol, Shah, Prashant, Cunningham, Joseph N, Vaynblat, Mikhail, Kazachkov, Mikhail
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Monitoring of intrapleural pressure (IPP) is used for evaluation of lung function in a number of pathophysiological conditions. We describe a telemetric method of non-invasive monitoring of the IPP in conscious animals intermittently or continuously for a prolonged period of time. Materials and methods After IACUC approval, six mongrel dogs were used for the study. After sedation, each dog was intubated and anesthetized using 0.5% Isoflurane. A telemetric implant model TL11M2-D70-PCT from Data Science International was secured subcutaneously. The pressure sensor tip of the catheter from the implant was inserted into the pleural space, and the catheter was secured with sutures. The IPP signals were recorded at a sampling rate of 100 points/second for 30 to 60 min daily for 4 days. From these recordings, the total mean negative IPP (mmHg), and the total mean negative IPP for a standard time of 30 min were calculated. In addition, the actual inspiratory and expiratory pressures were also measured from stable recording of the IPP waveforms. Results In six dogs, the total mean ± SD negative IPP was −10.8 ± 10.6 mmHg. After normalizing with respect to acquisition time it was −13.2 ± 11.2 mmHg/min. The actual inspiratory pressure was −19.7 ± 15.3, and the expiratory pressure was −11.0 ± 12.9. Conclusions Our study demonstrates that telemetric monitoring of IPP can be performed reliably and non-invasively in conscious experimental animals. The values for IPP in our study are compatible with the results of other investigators who used different methods of IPP measurement. Further work may show this method to be helpful in understanding the pathophysiology of various breathing disorders.
ISSN:0022-4804
1095-8673
DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.014