Loading…

Physical Stability of 20% Lipid Injectable Emulsions via Simulated Syringe Infusion: Effects of Glass vs Plastic Product Packaging

Background: The United States Pharmacopeia (USP) has proposed large-globule-size limits to ensure the physical stability of lipid injectable emulsions, expressed as the percent fat >5 μm, or PFAT5, not exceeding 0.05%. Visibly obvious phase separation as free oil has been shown to occur in some s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition 2007-03, Vol.31 (2), p.148-153
Main Authors: Driscoll, David F., Ling, Pei-Ra, Bistrian, Bruce R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: The United States Pharmacopeia (USP) has proposed large-globule-size limits to ensure the physical stability of lipid injectable emulsions, expressed as the percent fat >5 μm, or PFAT5, not exceeding 0.05%. Visibly obvious phase separation as free oil has been shown to occur in some samples if PFAT5 is >0.4%. We recently found that lipids, newly packaged in plastic (P), exceed the proposed USP limits and seem to produce less stable total nutrient admixtures compared with those made from conventional glass (G), which do meet proposed USP standards. We tested the possible stability differences between 20% lipid injectable emulsions in either P or G in a simulated neonatal syringe infusion study. Methods: Eighteen individual syringes were prepared from each 20% lipid injectable emulsion product (n = 36) and attached to a syringe pump set at an infusion rate of 0.5 mL/hour. The starting PFAT5 levels were measured at time 0 and after 24 hours of infusion, using a laser-based light obscuration technique as described by the USP Chapter . The data were assessed by a 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Container (G vs P) and Time as the independent variables and PFAT as the dependent variable. Results: At time 0, the starting PFAT5 level for lipids packaged in G was 0.006% ± 0.001% vs 0.162% ± 0.026% for P, whereas at the end of the infusion they were 0.013% ± 0.003% and 0.328% ± 0.046%, respectively. Significant differences were noted overall between groups for Container, Time, and Container-Time interaction (all p < .001). Bonferroni tests showed significant differences in PFAT5 levels between Containers at time 0 (T-0; p < .001) and T-0 vs T-24 for P-based lipids (p< .001), whereas no such differences were noted for Time for the G-based lipids. Similar results were noted for PFAT10 levels. Conclusions: We confirm that presently available lipid injectable emulsions packaged in newly introduced plastic containers exceed the proposed USP PFAT5 limits and subsequently become significantly less stable during a simulated syringe-based infusion. Although modest growth (p = NS) in large-diameter fat globules was observed for the glass-based lipids, they remained within proposed USP globule size limits throughout the study. Glass-based lipids seem to be a more stable dosage form and potentially a safer way to deliver lipids via syringe infusion to critically ill neonates. The United States Pharmacopeia (USP) proposes a stability-indicating method that lim
ISSN:0148-6071
1941-2444
DOI:10.1177/0148607107031002148